Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich won't appear on Missouri ballot
Chicago Tribune ^ | 11-22-11 | Paul West

Posted on 11/22/2011 5:59:07 PM PST by STARWISE

*snip*

The former House speaker, who is putting a campaign organization together on the fly, failed to qualify for the contest in the Show Me State.

According to the Missouri Secretary of State's office, Gingrich did not file the necessary papers as of Tuesday's 5 p.m. deadline. That means his name will not be on the Feb. 7 ballot.

The filing requirements are not particularly onerous. A $1,000 check and some paperwork are all that's needed.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: ballot; gingrich; missouri; mo; newt; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: STARWISE

Well then, conservatives in the Show-Me state are going to have to rally to Cain and give him the victory in order to deny those delegates to Romney.


41 posted on 11/22/2011 7:22:42 PM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Mittt Romney - he lacks the courage of his absence of convictions .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: order66.exe

See above.


42 posted on 11/22/2011 7:23:50 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
What a spoilsport you are. Just when all the infants were getting their didies in a twist to leak on daddy Gingrich, you come along and remind them of what idiot children they all are. Bad adult, bad!.
43 posted on 11/22/2011 7:26:10 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry
I read in the newspaper that Cain filed in MO within hours of the office opening, and Mittens' papers were filed by a big list of RINO's, to include Senator Blunt a few hours later.

Great. I hope the fix is not in for Mittens in the show-me state. Show-me what who controls the delegates, then, if not a primary vote....interesting.

44 posted on 11/22/2011 7:33:42 PM PST by elk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xzins; All
The Feb. 7 Missouri Primary is required by law, but no delegates to the national convention will be awarded because of it. Delegates to the national convention will be elected at Missouri state-wide caucuses on Saturday, March 17.

Because of rules agreed to by both major parties, all but a few states will be penalized by a reduction in national convention delegates if they hold their primaries before March 1. By law, Missouri's is in February; the state legislature didn't approve a move of the primary to March (another series of bungles), so the state Republican Party had to call for and approve caucuses. Hence, the March 17 caucuses will choose the state's delegates to the national convention.

The February 7 primary is a very expensive beauty contest - straw poll - and nothing more. The results that matter will come during the March 17 caucuses.

45 posted on 11/22/2011 7:33:51 PM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

What do you mean? Herman Cain went up to New Hampshire and successfully filed his own delegate list.


46 posted on 11/22/2011 7:35:05 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456

Thanks, Prov3456.

So Newt’s choice makes sense.


47 posted on 11/22/2011 7:37:04 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Well, it isn’t the delegate contest, but still seems odd.

I’m worried about candidates here in Virginia, just because I’ve only seen one petition yet, for Herman Cain (I signed it, of course). I’ve even sent e-mails to several campaigns, and now Gingrich sends me lots of e-mails, but still nothing about getting petitions.

In 2008, Duncan Hunter failed to get enough signatures.


48 posted on 11/22/2011 7:39:28 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks STARWISE.


49 posted on 11/22/2011 7:42:32 PM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Well, it isn’t the delegate contest, but still seems odd.

Yes, the MO delegate contest is later in the campaign cycle.

I would add that Newt lags in funding.

No sense Newt spending his precious little money campaigning in MO in early February where he can't earn delegates.

50 posted on 11/22/2011 7:50:51 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

That is why I have always called Newt the absent minded professor.


51 posted on 11/22/2011 7:55:09 PM PST by federal__reserve (What matters in 2012 is jobs, jobs, jobs! Jobs kill unemployment, foreclosures & deficits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Amazing how many people don’t read the posts but instead just post their blather. Thanks for setting things straight.


52 posted on 11/22/2011 7:57:15 PM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The Missouri primary is less than meaningless.

The GOP tried to stop it, but the Democrat Secretary of State (a member of the hillbilly-criminal Carnahan family) insisted upon spending the millions of dollars and forcing the primary vote, which will not count because it is a month earlier than allowed.

Carnahan: Missouri should hold presidential primary

The Missouri presidential primary and the timing of it have prompted controversy this fall. State law currently schedules the primary on Feb. 7, which is about a month earlier than what now is allowed under rules set by the national Republican and Democratic parties.

To avoid jumbling the national presidential selection calendar and getting penalized by losing half its delegates at the national convention, the Missouri Republican Party has opted for a caucus process that starts in March. County caucuses select delegates, who can signal allegiance to a presidential candidate but are not required to do so, to attend congressional district conventions April 21 and the state convention June 2. At each of those meetings, roughly half of Missouri's delegates to the Republican National Convention will be selected and bound to support a presidential candidate.

53 posted on 11/22/2011 7:58:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("The very idea of a community organizer is to stir up a mob for some political purpose." Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

oops


54 posted on 11/22/2011 8:01:15 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

wow


55 posted on 11/22/2011 8:01:38 PM PST by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Don’t worry, the smartest man in the world just jumped out with my knapsack...


56 posted on 11/22/2011 8:01:56 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

LOL, good one!


57 posted on 11/22/2011 8:13:30 PM PST by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed! WWW.MIKEMcCALISTERFORSENATE.COM check him out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mriguy67

Does he need write-in delegates too? It might not do him any good to be on the ballot if there are no delegates running as “Committed to Newt Gingrich.”

Now there may be delegates running as “Uncommitted” that pledge to support Gingrich if he wins the state primary or the congressional district. However this indicates Gingrich is not serious about running for President.


58 posted on 11/22/2011 8:23:29 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Sorry to disappoint you upchuck but MO is trying to do away with the primarys. Republican Party executive director Lloyd Smith said earlier this week that it has become obvious the GOP “will take necessary steps to select our delegates to the national convention in a way other than the primary.” Smith did not specify what those steps could be.
No matter what, Missouri currently is scheduled to hold an election Feb. 7 — even if it is not used to award delegates to candidates.

http://www.columbiamissourian.com/stories/2011/09/29/mo-republicans-consider-presidential-caucuses/


59 posted on 11/22/2011 9:05:20 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign; sickoflibs; Godzilla; ejonesie22; Elsie; T Minus Four

So the people don’t have a voice in MO? Does the party take into account who wins the primary?

Sounds like Romney’s Missouri ancestors to me.


60 posted on 11/22/2011 9:55:08 PM PST by reaganaut (Romney IS Obama - just 'white and delightsome' 2 Nephi 30:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson