Posted on 11/21/2011 11:32:24 AM PST by Fred
I cant understand why Newt Gingrich is getting such a pass on his Freddie Mac consulting. He claims to have been a historian for this outfit? FHLMC needs a historian like the U.S.A. needs a Department of Education, like Europe needs a common currency, like like I dunno, like Michelle Obama needs another $12,000 accessory.
I sputtered about this on last weeks Radio Derb:
Newts trying to ju-jitsu the thing, telling us that his experience as a shill for Freddie Mac gave him valuable insider understanding of governmental affairs. Isnt that what we want in a candidate, valuable insider understanding of governmental affairs? Quote from Newt, on the campaign trail in Iowa Wednesday, quote: It reminds people that I know a great deal about Washington. We just tried four years of amateur ignorance, and it didnt work very well. So having someone who actually knows Washington might be a really good thing.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
The article did, zombie-boy:
Now here he is in Iowa this week defending Freddie Mac
Gawd, I am surrounded by dyslexic Newt zombies. Kinda like the Walking Dead but just annoying instead of entertainingly scary.
“Meanwhile, you steadfastly avoid anything remotely resembling a substantive debate.”
Now you accuse me of being reluctant to engage in a battle of wits with you. You are unarmed.
You are a proven liar. Why would I want to pursue a duel with an unarmed man???
You have said nothing of interest to me. You have no integrity and less intellect. Don’t take this too hard, though. The media uses useful idiots like you to parrot their lies all the time.
Take a few minutes to “Google” the Contract with America and see how little of it was ever voted upon, let alone enacted.
Drop the zombie shtick - it makes you sound like an arrogant ass.
So the zombie description fits y'all to a T - the only part of your brains that appear to still be working is the bite reflex - you sure as hell ain't acting logically by making a big deal out of me cutting-and-pasting from the original posted article.
Chickensh**. You haven't added a single substantive comment to this thread, xombie-boy. I commented on the larger Newt quote - as you demanded - and you have yet to add your own counter-comment to my point of view. Which means you are just here like some siimeball political hack to change the subject. Which clearly you and the other Newt zombies don't like.
“You haven’t added a single substantive comment to this thread, xombie-boy.”
Well, except I have shown you for what you are...a lying bstrd. I’d say that’s something everyone now knows. Maybe they used to believe your clownish crap.
What’s a xombie? Something you read and copied from someone else, so it’s not your fault you don’t know what it is or whether or not it is correct?
I’ll bet nothing is ever your fault, is it Skippy?
Except I am not, jackass.
I cut and pasted from the original article, yet to you that makes me a liar.
And as it turned out, the complete quote made little difference - and I commented on the entire quote, and how it showed Newt still doesn't get the dangers of good intentions on the fedgov level, and what do you post back? Nada..
So go ahead and pretend you've done anything of substance on this thread. You haven't. And you have shown just how intellectually bankrupt you are.
“And as it turned out, the complete quote made little difference...”
Just like your schooling?
Yet another post of utterly no substance. Get back to me when you have something to actually comment upon that relates to the thread topic.
“Yet another post of utterly no substance. Get back to me when you have something to actually comment upon that relates to the thread topic”.
OK. Hold your breath, would ya?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.