Is this a quiz..
My answer - A Super Nova???
Soylent Green is .. people.
Yes! Part of the homosexual agenda is to lower the age of consent.
The homosexual community in the US shuns NAMBLA and does not want to talk about the issue, but the same activist groups in Europe and elsewhere have worked hard to lower the age of consent in many countries, succeeding in most to lower the age to 14 years old.
Oh this is so easy...my guess is that if you report such a thing in a liberal milieu like academia you’re likely to be accused of hate speech against gays and then be fired.
Does any one doubt that what we’re talking about at Penn State is homosexuality? There, I said it!
Oh this is so easy...my guess is that if you report such a thing in a liberal milieu like academia you’re likely to be accused of hate speech against gays and then be fired.
Does any one doubt that what we’re talking about at Penn State is homosexuality? There, I said it!
Rush has been AWOL on the rabid homosexual agenda since at least 1990.
He’s dead silent about it.
I think Michael Brown is over stating that Rush is scared to attack this, or that it could “end his career.”
Rush is fearless, but he picks his battles. This battle is quintessentially something Michael Brown is passionate about. It’s in his wheelhouse so to speak.
It is not squarely in Rush’s wheelhouse - especially in the days of Obama, Reid and Pelosi and a GOP nomination fight.
I can only guess at what Rush was implying and I believe that implication was that the Penn State football program is more important than anything and that includes child molestation. Just my interpretation, you understand.
I will say what I think it could be.
It could be that nobody wants to touch the homosexual child abuse angle. The media will talk about this as a child abuse scandal in general terms, without specifying that this is a case of same-sex abuse.
The gay pressure groups were active with the media in the Catholic Church scandal. Though most of the victims were boys and young men, the media downplayed that fact, and always referred to it as a child abuse scandal in general terms, without specifying who the victims were.
I personally was banned from another message board, because I expressed shock and anger at homosexual rape in this case. I was flamed by many, who said that it would be just as bad if he had raped girls, and that abuse and assault are bad no matter who the victims are, and that talking about the “gay” issues was wrong of me.
Diaper rash, the answer is diaper rash.
What did I win?
“What was Rush talking about?”
ANSWER: Gay Control of Today’s Media.
I’ve listened to Rush since 1991. Every year someone says he is doomed...for 20 years.
The corruption that pervades big time sports, pro and college ( reduncency).
I’m inclined to doubt that’s exactly what Rush had in mind, but clearly we have reached the point where it is considered inflammatory and defamatory to point out the obvious: that buggering little boys is a homosexual act. Water is wet. The sun is bright. There, now I’ve said it.
If anything, I think there may be some organized crime connection here, and I mean old-time mafia-style organized crime. Gangsters run prostitution rings, don’t they? Why not a child prostitution ring? And what if Sandusky was doing “try-outs” among neglected kids to find out which ones would go along with bizarre sex?
Most people look at Joe and see a kindly old gent. But look at him closely, and let your mind wander for a moment. What if Saint Joe is really a “Don?” Oh no, no Rush, it couldn’t be!!!! Oh no? Why not?
Obviously he`s talking about gay sex in sports, and how the powers that be don`t want to open that can of worms. One need only recall how he lost his commentator`s job over talking about race to know he`s wary of talking about another social issue in connection with sports.
Homosexuality is the elephant dancing in the china shop.
If you do, you will be destroyed; it happened to Anita Bryant, and it almost happened to Laura Schlesinger.
The Penn State scandal is a homosexual pedophile scandal, but you cannot say that publicly.
You have to call it a "sex scandal," because that implies willing participation of consenting adults, even thought that is not the truth about what happened.
Right now, the story is Sandusky molesting children, and everyone else failing to say anything, from an assistant who witnessed it, to a coach who made a phone call, but asked no questions, and never followed up, etc.
The media, hasn't asked, nor brought up, are there others ? Not every child molester works alone, and this guy ran an organization, he was close with alumni, he had friends, he was no loner.
Who else knew, when did they know, what did they know, and was anyone else involved ?