To: UltraConservative
What About Newt?What about him?
2 posted on
11/16/2011 7:47:01 AM PST by
NoGrayZone
(Stay involved..because stupid people are running America! - Herman Cain - Amen!!!)
To: UltraConservative
Which Newt are we voting for? That is the problem.
3 posted on
11/16/2011 7:47:32 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
To: UltraConservative
They can keep trying to manipulate us to vote for a rino, fake polls, Drama over pauses, Drama over Axelrod hit attempts. But we are still going with Cain by default. Too much at stake for more of the same to continue.
4 posted on
11/16/2011 7:53:42 AM PST by
Mechanicos
(Why does the DOE have a SWAT Team?)
To: UltraConservative
Newt, or Mitt?
That is the question.
(Till Newt implodes, like all those who went before him....)
To: UltraConservative
“. . . in a general election, hell have some trouble with the female vote.”
Is that the same female vote that wet themselves twice over BJ Clinton?
9 posted on
11/16/2011 8:15:42 AM PST by
Arm_Bears
(Once they've called you a racist, you've got nothing to lose.)
To: UltraConservative
10 posted on
11/16/2011 8:26:18 AM PST by
Elle Bee
To: UltraConservative
How long has Newt been married to his third wife? Perhaps he has long since passed the stage of immaturity, has found faith in God and is focused on the issues of this nation. Also, if our Founding Fathers were placed under the scrutiny that our candidates are, it is likely we would still be bowing to the crown of England. Furthermore, all you Ron Paul supporters: get over it because he will NEVER be a front runner for nomination. I repeat - NEVER! As a Texan, I have watched the Ron Paul show for forty odd years and he is just a bit on the far side of lunacy even though he is obviously an intelligent man with at least one good idea regarding the FED. NEWT is our best shot at bringing sanity back to this great nation.
11 posted on
11/16/2011 8:29:37 AM PST by
Jukeman
To: UltraConservative
Newt is out for Newt and will subordinate his core "principles" if it suits him. (early support of Obamacare when he had med-records interest; Newt & Nancy sitting on a couch ... there's plenty of examples).
I believe the inside scoop on his days as Speaker reveal that newt is devoid of any management skills. Idea man, great; RNC chair? Wasserman-Shultz antidote? go for it; POTUS? not so much.
12 posted on
11/16/2011 8:40:48 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(At 4 AM, it is a test; at 2 PM, it is a demonstration)
To: UltraConservative
"Gingrichs liberal leanings have all been out of office, while Romneys liberal leanings were all in office. When Gingrich was actually in a position of power, he was perhaps the most conservative Speaker of the House in American history. The Republican Revolution of 1994 was his baby. Welfare reform was his baby. The booming Clinton economy? That could be more accurately attributed to Gingrich. On foreign policy, Newt has never wavered he has always been a hawk. Down deep, Newt is a conservative." The money quote...skip the rest of the BS.
13 posted on
11/16/2011 8:57:20 AM PST by
jessduntno
("They say the world has become too complex for simple answers... they are wrong." - RR)
To: UltraConservative
Gingrichs liberal leanings have all been out of office, while Romneys liberal leanings were all in office. When Gingrich was actually in a position of power, he was perhaps the most conservative Speaker of the House in American history.
Good enough for me. I really think he can beat Obama. I know he has baggage but, "let him who is without sin cast the first stone".
16 posted on
11/16/2011 11:01:00 AM PST by
no dems
(Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson