Posted on 11/11/2011 3:33:11 AM PST by Scanian
Herman Cain may not have to take a lie detector test because, as one investigator claims, he already did - and passed with flying colours. The sexual harassment scandal has shaken Cain’s campaign but has showed few signs of derailing it, as he spoke at Wednesday night's Republican debate to loud applause. In the face of the accusations, Cain said earlier this week that he was willing to take a lie detector test, but only 'if I have to.'
Enter TJ Ward, a private investigator who claims to have a fool-proof method of separating the honest from the liars.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Is there a point you were trying to make?
Yes. The software is laughably INACCURATE.
Googled Donna Donella pix. In group shot of with pals, she is the least attractive . Possibly by choice and overfed. Gaydar alert, gay motives.
You are correct about that.
I remember flying El Al back in the 80’s. The officer asked me some very funny questions, which I answered truthfully and got on the plane. It is MUCH more unpleasant and invasive now.
I would rather be alone in a room with Herman Cain than a TSA Agent.
Likewise you and your candidate. Which is?
Too bad for Perry that the machine would not have worked-at least for 53 seconds.
Not true. Not ten, (you would need to name at least 40), not documented. (like the demanding of a deathbed divorce?)
Yes, Newt has baggage. Has he ever been accused of putting his hand up the skirt of a woman he doesn't know and pulling her head toward his crotch? I must have missed that one.
I don't know the answer to this, so consider it an actual question.
Did Newt have at least two sex harassment charges, where thousands of dollars were paid to keep the women quiet?
I never hear it asked .... Why did Cain LEAVE the NRA around the time of these sex charges? Isn't it a little curious? Maybe Cain was becoming too much trouble to have around.
I don't know if Cain is guilty or not. BUT! BLINDLY defending him with absolutely no evidence, other than his denials, is pathetic. What about these women? What if they are telling the truth? Something happened, they were paid thousands of dollars. Maybe we should ask O’Reily’s body language lady, then we would know for SURE!
TY
The problem with Newt is you never know which one will show up - Conservative Newt, Liberal Newt, EcoTerrorist Newt or Socialist Newt?
Add the fact Newt stated “the Reagan Era is over”....a bigtime NO THANKS!
So was O.J.
Exoneration of the McCann's is not a rational measure of a technology that is used all over the world by law enforcement to good effect. BTW, I am not defending LVA...just offering a link to anyone who might want to look into it.
You seem to have a lot of emotion invested in this issue. Is that due to your opposition to Cain?
So, it would appear that you don’t believe Cain, and there is nothing that can change your mind.
Granted, I don’t know it this guy’s software is indeed 95% accurate, but then again, I have yet to hear or see anybody contradict his claims as being bogus. If there were any legitimate scientific or statistical evidence that contradicts this guy’s claims, I’m sure the MSM, the Whitehouse, DNC, RNC, Romney, Gloria Allred, RINO’s and liberals would be doing everything in their power to make it front page news. But as yet, nada.
I suspect you are either a Romney, Perry, Bachman, or Huntsman supporter. But that’s OK. Just keep beating your little drum on behalf of your candidate. I’m sticking with Herman Cain.
OJ was investigated by the police and as a result, he was indicted and put on trial for murder...
The McCanns were investigated by the police and EXONERATED by the same police who investigated them.
Newt was correct..... it is now, not then. the problems and the world are different. To think otherwise is to be too comfortable under the rock
I support Herman and would love to jump on this evidence in his defense but voice stress analysis is voodoo BS. Independant study after independant study shows their reslts are no more reliable than random chance. They have gotten popular because they are much cheaper to use than polygraphs, and are used for the same reason - to coerce confessions. But for reliability - you might just a well toss a handful of JuJu beans into a circle filled with chicken feathers drenched in goat’s blood.
The results are not the problem. Having to take a polygraph test is a humiliating experience in itself which is what his opponents want. No way Cain's team should agree to this.
Bump for later viewing
Are you saying that doesn't work?
;-)
I expect we will be starting to hear more about Gingrich’s history soon. It seems when Gingrich had the contract with America he was on top of things, then he went downhill after he was not Speaker.
This morning Rove was on Fox I turned it off before he came on I refuse to watch their politics again. What I watched was a guy with historic military medals. At any rate, I am sure that Rove was going to say that Perry’s support is going to go to Romney and Romney will be candidate.
Thoughts?????
They must be in the 5%.
“He claims the program is “95% accurate”. How could you possibly measure that?”
Because, when tested against Obama, it says he is lying 95% of the time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.