OJ was investigated by the police and as a result, he was indicted and put on trial for murder...
The McCanns were investigated by the police and EXONERATED by the same police who investigated them.
First your repeated posts on this software are really not necessary, nor is your vanity posting...
Two technically police do not EXONERATE, they simply move to a different suspect. Exonerate is to absolve someone from blame for a fault or wrongdoing. Last time I checked you are innocent until PROVEN guilty, so you can’t be exonerated until you are charged and then cleared by a Judge/Jury after due consideration of the case.
Third, you state it is laughably inaccurate because using your ONE example it supposedly failed (I say supposedly because the case is STILL OPEN). So if 70 law enforcement agencies are using it and have each used it only twice and it failed once in your scenario...yep it meets the claim of 95%.
You are way to eager to take a he said - she said scenario from over a decade ago and claim one side or the other is guilty (in your case you are obviously anti-Cain). There was no wrong doing here...the hilarious thing about this is he was a man and she was a woman meeting in private. The meeting was not in a workplace, there was no employer - employee relationship, it was not an interview, it was a private meeting at a hotel/car. Hmmm...seems to happen all the time and some of those times one of the participants thinks there is more to the situation (ie. reading that this is a date or something) and makes advances and the other side says “whoa...hold your horses” and guess what it ends. and they go their separate ways. Other times they find out they are a match and they are off to wonderland together. No one will ever know why these two people really met (if in fact they did) nor will they know what happened. It was at worse case a failed date/a failed attempt to get a favor. At best case it is all made up...either way...non-issue.