Posted on 11/09/2011 12:08:13 PM PST by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: So we have the latest Herman Cain press conference yesterday. I have a lot of people who thought he did great. A lot of people. (interruption) No, just people sending me e-mails think he did great, thought his lawyer did great (which was fascinating) and then I got a couple e-mails from people criticizing so-called conservative journalists. I don't know who it was, but one of them I guess said -- and this, really, prompted a number of e-mails from people riled up. One of journalists considered to be a conservative said, "The Herman Cain press conference raised more questions than it answered," and I said, "Well, you understand, now, that's Journalism 101." That reaction is actually taught in journalism school. You hear a journalist say that after a press conference? Herman Cain, what else could he do? He asked for a lie detector test, said he would take a lie detector test.
"I don't even know the woman." Do you realize how wide open he's left himself? If he's lying to us, he's finished forever. Even if this presidential campaign started only as a lark to try to get a media gig or maybe get TV appearances on a cable show or whatever his motivation was -- and I'm not discounting that it was seriously to win at the same time. But if what he did yesterday is proven to be total lie, if he does and has known this Bialek babe, it's over. So what else can he do? And then the reaction from a journalist is, "It raised more questions than it answered." That is taught in Journalism 101. You have a reaction like that, that generally means you're gunning for the guy and you're attempting to influence the way viewers who also watch the Cain press conference thought about it. Most of the e-mail I got from people was they thought it was good -- that his lawyer was good, that it was straightforward and honest. He was a real guy, this kind of stuff. If he lied and if it can be established that he lied and if there's some sexual harassment out there, guaranteed, folks, a slot at CNN.
I give you Eliot Spitzer as proof.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Now, what did I just tell you? By the way, it was Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard who people that e-mailed me said had said that Cain "raised more questions than he answered." Looky here. I you told you it was Journalism 101. David Goldstein, McClatchy newspapers: "Herman Cain's effort to control the damage from sexual harassment allegations has raised more questions than it's answered." It's Journalism 101, and when you get that reaction to it, it means that that particular journalist is gunning for the candidate, gunning for the source, the subject of the story. He doesn't want to believe it, not buying into it. This is where it is. The smart money is saying Herman Cain just can't survive this onslaught.
Now the babes are gonna have a joint presser. They're going to have a joint presser. A panel! A panel of accusers. You know, last night even before I knew what a disaster I was facing this morning here, I was thinking of not showing up to do the show today unless I had a full panel of other talk show hosts beside me for support. I said, "That's silly. I don't need a panel. I don't need guests. I don't do guests!" What are these babes gonna do with a panel? What does it prove? What does getting five people together for a press conference prove? (interruption) Oh, is that it? On their own they can't swing the day? (interruption) Well, the only way you prove a negative is with a lie detector, and that's even dubious, of course.
If he passes the lie detector they'll just say, "Ah, ah, ah, ah! That raises more questions than it answers." There's no way that he is going to -- within the journalism community, within the punditocracy -- win this. Now, with the people, with the voters, different story, and who knows? But does getting five people together for a press conference add more weight, does it add more proof? You get five people together to accuse somebody of something, does that make it true? Is that some part of Sharia law that I haven't learned about yet, or does having five people just make it harder to go into any of the specifics of any of their charges or their background? See, I think that's what it is. You got all five of them up there and it's a little tougher to individually examine them, and the reason that it's important...
When people make allegations like this, it is important that they come forward. They need to be judged, their credibility, their story needs to be judged equally with the person they're accusing -- and that's why the Politico, all these anonymous details, anonymous sources, anonymous bits of evidence and so forth? It's why they were having trouble. One of the questions I would have if I had the opportunity to be at this panel that the babes... I shouldn't say "babe," should I? One of the questions that the women are going to engage in is, "Who is paying your legal fees?" You see, that's why I'm not a reporter. I would be kicked out of the club if I asked a question like that: "Who is paying your legal fees?" Such simple and direct questions are never permitted. The questions are gonna be more like those asked of Herman Cain. Like, "Do you think sexual harassment is a serious matter?"
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: There is the most amazing story, and it looks like a random act of journalism from the AP on the latest accuser, this Kraushaar babe, Karen Kraushaar, 55, a pattern of whining. This is a person who has tried to use being offended for personal gain. AP exclusive: "Accuser Filed Complaint in Next Job." It is an amazing story. I can't believe that AP ran it. It's long as it can be. I don't know that I want to get into every smidgen little detail of it. I might. It just depends on how things unfold here on the big program today. But I'll tell you what this panel means. When all five of these women gather together, if they actually do this, the way to translate that, what that means is this isn't working, let's try ganging up.
Now, everybody in the media says that Clinton -- and we've talked about this -- everybody in the media says that Clinton handled his sex accusations perfectly, that he had a strategy out there, that there was an organization. Remember David Gregory, the Grand Wizard of NBC News, he was telling Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post, what really gets the media, let's be honest here, there's no strategy here, there's no organization, so there's no way we can plan to screw this guy. He's winging it, and we're not used to people winging. When you wing it you generally tell the truth. But we don't know how to deal with this. We need a strategy. We need a formula. We need this guy behaving like everybody else. Clinton did it the right way.
What does that mean? What would Clinton do? There's a "what would Jesus do?" campaign. The media is out there constructing "what would Clinton do?" Clinton would call this panel of five women the band of bimbos, and James Carville would be out there waving a dollar bill in front of them to see how many of them would start disrobing for it. And he'd call whoever put it together a sex pervert. But they would be out there, the Democrats would be attacking the accusers. Now, isn't it fascinating, now you've got the accusers, these women, and now the Democrats, why, they're holier-than-thou, they're clean and pure as the wind-driven snow, why, women don't lie about this, folks. They don't make these things up. This is too traumatic, women don't want to make this up and live this lie. It's bad enough when it's real. So that's what Clinton would do, classy stuff like that.
Now, this Karen Kraushaar -- and I'm pretty sure that's how she pronounces because I've known somebody named Kraushaar in my life. I have. It was a guy, and he worked for somebody you all know and I know. And I don't know that he's related to this woman or not. There's a lot of Kraushaars out there, but he spelled his name the same way and that's how he pronounced it, Kraushaar. So we're gonna call her Karen Kraushaar. She says that she eventually dropped her complaint because it was relatively minor. But she had demanded untold thousands of dollars as well as back vacation pay and a $16,000 raise and a fellowship to Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. That's what she wanted. (interruption) I know, Cain did his whole press conference last night without a teleprompter. He did. He doesn't need a teleprompter. People that know what they're going to say generally don't.
END TRANSCRIPT
What happened to the other 3? Or is that just more lie?
DemocRAT white womyn going after the “black guy”. Now, according to one of those ditzy broads, Cain is a “monster”. Awesome. And the commies call US the racists!
The only reason for these “gals” to do a joint press conference is to provide cover for them to get together and get their stories straight so that they’ll be able to paint a pattern of behavior that’s “consistent” between each set of allegations.
BHO2 will order anything, do anything, say anything to destroy the Republican candidate for President. Obama is behind this all the way.
This situation with women coming out of the woodwork to accuse Cain of sexual improprieties is monstrous and obviously contrived political smearing, period.
BHO2’s presidential campaign is based on race. Cain as an opponent will demolish Obama’s plans. So, Cain must be eliminated as a political threat to Obama. It is just that simple.
The way to counter this is to attack the women’s reputations and find who hired them to do this. It has become obvious all of them have ties in some way to either Obama operatives or indirectly to the administration.
Mrs.Cain must come forward and stand with her man. The Cains, as a couple, must shut-down this nonsense.
The majority of the American people are not stupid and they recognize a “high tech lynching” when they see one. What they definitely want to see and expect is a righteous indignation and anger towards those who lie and contrive to destroy the reputation of a good man. Only Herman Cain can do that.
“Band of Bimbos”
I’m wondering if they are going to be able to get any more than the two...maybe the third.
All I know of is Krausshar and Bialek, and the one women who wouldn’t make the dinner appointment for Cain and another woman because she doubted his motives, but then went to dinner with him herslef with a couple of friends and indicated nothing sexual occurred.
Would she be the third? I dont’t think so...no traction there.
So I’m thinking maybe just the two. Krausshar has a habit of making allegation and then wanting to settle for thousands...and Bialek has a reputation of bankruptcy, assets being siezed, IRS trouble, and paternity suits...oh, and she likes new hair-dos a lot.
Come on, this would be akin to the three-stooges and laughable on its face if it weren’t being funded by so much moeny and so much publicity in an effort to bring a GOP presidential contender down...and that’s what it is...what is is all about.
I hope Cain’s new lawyer gets right in their face and lets them know that any more of this libel and defamation will face a six or seven figure law suit each.
And Cain himself, I hope he just ignores it and tells the press when they have questrions to refer back tpo his press conference until such time that they have new information with verifable evidence that proves anything he said was wrong. until the, he has answered the allegations and is moving on with his campaign.
Five? I only know of one that has released any claims - Sharon. Are there others that are going to do that now?
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2011-11-08/herman-cain-accusers/51129758/1
That should help.
There are 2 who received severane packages one of whom is Joel Bennet’s client (Krausheer)and one anonymous.
There is Sharon Bialek who is Gloria Allred’s client.
That makes 3 - unless Bialek is the other severance recipient. Then it would be TWO.
The first 2 or 3 “anonymous” are the same as the non-anomymous gals that “came out”.
The MSM are trying to play it like they are different people, and increasing the numbers by this obfuscation.
HBO = Herman Bimbo Opportunists
When they go feral, they start hunting in packs.
Well, there’s some heresay that #2 was actually #4, as in Bialek.
Kraushaar needs to stick to licking the bottoms of Obama’s feet and keep her big mouth shut.
Perhaps the anonymous woman is not going to come forward, for whatever reason. I have no doubts, however, that Gloria Allred is working on her.
It would be great if this anonymous woman would come forward and tell the world just how many calls she has been getting to ask her to join the lynch mob.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.