Posted on 11/08/2011 10:30:17 AM PST by NormsRevenge
-——It appears the courts are going to rule obama care is constitutional-——
What evidence do you have for that?
Whenever Team Romney had rumors they wanted to start about other candidates,
Jonathan Martin has been their go-to guy to get those rumors in writing in front of a national audience.
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
“particularly disturbing”
Compared to what? Illegal immigrant employees, no. But for a sex scandal, it is ho-hum.
Excuse me, Perry has said nothing critical of Cain on this matter.
Ron Paul may not know Cain exists and Gingrich has his own baggage.
If you think Cain has it bad now, just wait until the MSM gets ahold of Newt’s past. 2 ex wifes, multiple relationships, messy divorces, ect. Plus, an issue with recent policy flip flips will do Newt in. Then, we are stuck with Romney.
Got zotted.
The DC court of appeals ruled today, or yesterday, that it is not against the constitution for congress to mandate insurance be bought. One of the judges was appointed by Reagan.
Hey Mittens, the fact that you are a flip- flopping ass hat with no core values is a serious allegation that needs to be addressed!!!!
Romney is such a pig.
Cain was never supposed to be the nominee.
Gingrich is not going to be the nominee.
Rick Perry is going to be the nominee.
Once tempers subside and logic starts taking back over, it's clear that Perry is going to beat Mitt for the nomination and we'll all thank God Perry didn't drop out when he tanked in the polls and we'll all thank God he has a real ground game in all 50 states. And we'll all thank God he has as much money as Mitt to combat him nation wide.
Once people have an expectation for you in politics (30% in the polls)and you fail to meet them (7% in the polls) they are not magically going to change back to respecting you. Once you lose the voters trust, it is almost impossible for a politician to get it back
That is not fair or right, it is human nature.
I’m sorry; this has been pointed out to you several times on several different threads. The Axelrod you cite is a DIFFERENT Axelrod. Bialek lived in the same swanky Lake Shore Drive building as THE David Axelrod, but says she had no dealings with him.
The lawyer is a DIFFERENT Axelrod.
It strikes me that Mitt rhymes with another word.
Someone posted it earlier in the thread:
But I didn't know until this day, that it was Barzini Romney all along.
Maybe we should put that in Breaking News? We're starting to look stupid connecting her to the David Axelrod who is not David Axelrod.
If Mittins is the ticket, I will write in Sarah. If the RNC puts in Mittins, the RNC has to go.
Perry has shown over the last two weeks a new tact and renewed grasp of running a national campaign.
Perry has all the stats to beat both Mitt and Obama. He has all the money and all the ground game.
Perry is still in double digits nationally and the majority have not even made up their mind.
Don't forget also, you still have Palin and DeMint endorsements (even though Demint said he wouldn't. You have state governors endorsements, all which go to Perry because he knows them all.
I'm telling you keep your eyes peeled because Perry is gonna come out of this as the comeback kid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.