[Thane_Banquo]

I think he just screwed up. Claimed he had never seen the woman before, even though there is a picture of them together.

[Raebie]

there wasn’t a picuture. it wasn’t him.

[goodnesswins]

Where’s the picture?

[FourPeas]

In the course of his position of CEO of NRA, he had to have had his picture taken with a lot of people. I doubt he remembers most of them.

[isthisnickcool]

I think he just screwed up. Claimed he had never seen the woman before, even though there is a picture of them together.

I'm not a Cain supporter but I know that the picture that has been shown today is NOT of this woman. Yes, the woman is blonde but it is not this accuser!!!

[penelopesire]

The man is on a countrywide campaign trial..he can’t be expected to remember every person that grabs his ear or asks for a picture.

[justlurking]

I think he just screwed up. Claimed he had never seen the woman before, even though there is a picture of them together.

There is a picture floating around that was originally thought to be Cain and Bialek, with two other people. I posted it, from an article at the Sun-Times.

But, the website was subsequently updated to caption the picture, saying that the woman was someone else -- the woman being quoted in the article.

[txmissy]

It’s not her.

[CedarDave]

I think he just screwed up. Claimed he had never seen the woman before, even though there is a picture of them together.

If you are referring to the picture of Cain and a blond at a recent Tea Party function, that was not her but the reporter Amy something. The accuser Sharon Bialek was there and went and gave him a hug but I haven't seen a picture of her and him.

[Hoodat]

I think he just screwed up. Claimed he had never seen the woman before, even though there is a picture of them together.

No, he claimed he doesn't remember the woman. Big difference.

[ssnt]

The woman in that photo is not Sharon.