Posted on 11/05/2011 3:16:26 PM PDT by blueyon
Republican 2012 presidential candidates Republican 2012 presidential candidates Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich met in a Lincoln-Douglas style debate on current economic and social issues facing the U.S.
Of course, he'd never let himself get caught without his leftist media enabler and slobberer, so it will never happen.
CNN is having a hissy fit!!!!
bashing Cain beyond belief....nothing about the debate, all about what happened AFTER the debate when the media wanted to talk about the story that has a source that doesn’t want to talk...
wow....
Well, you’ll get a lot of laughs then because he’s used the crouton line on every Perry thread for the last two weeks.
I think Cain has what it takes to be a decisive leader. As long as he picks the right people to be around him, I think he will do fine.
One final comment on Gingrich. Yes, he has personal baggage. I think he should address some of that, such as the pix with Pelosi and glo-bull warming and focus on convincing us why we should trust a Contract with America 2011.
Yes, he has had three spouses. So has Rush Limbaugh. So have a lot of other people. If we are going to eat him alive for past decisions and indiscretions in his personal life, we are in danger of shooting ourselves in the foot. That goes for all the candidates. Poor policy decisions are one thing, and it’s prudent to consider the entire candidate, their backgrounds etc. But we need to be careful about dimissing a candidate based solely on their personal backgrounds.
The objective is removing Barack Hussein Obama from office. This will be no easy task. Let us not in our zeal be our own worse enemies.
Goog grief, you are a piece of work.
Good grief, you are a piece of work.
There is a lot of banter about Cain/Gingrich or Gingrich/Cain.
Stage one is that the voting can not be split to give a RINO a chance to win because of a split conservative vote in any primary, period.
Stage two is who would be the best to debate Obama, especially when he will invoke race no matter who the nominee is. Who is best suited to take it on face to face, or by his very presence, to neuter the entire argument?
The best thing to happen for our society for everyone is to have an honest broker with the bully pulpit to bring the race issue front and center without the media filter skewing any debate. Herman Cain is a terrific role model to turn this whole sorry episode around.
PS IT WAS GREAT!!!!
And they think no one notices.....
There is a lot of banter about Cain/Gingrich or Gingrich/Cain.
Stage one is that the voting can not be split to give a RINO a chance to win because of a split conservative vote in any primary, period.
Stage two is who would be the best to debate Obama, especially when he will invoke race no matter who the nominee is. Who is best suited to take it on face to face, or by his very presence, to neuter the entire argument?
The best thing to happen for our society for everyone is to have an honest broker with the bully pulpit to bring the race issue front and center without the media filter skewing any debate. Herman Cain is a terrific role model to turn this whole sorry episode around.
I don't know. Go read his bio, if you want to know.
Sweet Sixteen!
God bless her!
What happened after the debate?
You don’t seriously think that Perry will pick up any black votes being an obvious racist with his hunting club sign?
Sheesh what a maroon.
how long will you be singing the praises of a single digit impersonator.
Actually, those here are commenting in a thread. I assume they are also watching the debate (well, not now that it’s over). Most people can do two or three things at once. Some were able to watch the debate and still make snarky personal attacks on a candidate who wasn’t invited to this debate, and I figure if they can do those two things, they could also read a response from me while watching.
Hopefully, my extra words in the thread didn’t distract you too much.
Well I claim and shout from the mountain tops that I want Perry to immolate himself.
Neither did they talk about public employee benefits and how those are sucking the country dry. Of course unions never entered the conversation either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.