Posted on 11/03/2011 11:15:35 AM PDT by presidio9
The Republican candidates for President may not pose much of a threat to Barack Obama.
The very best Halloween parade this year would feature all the Republicans trying to get their party’s presidential nomination.
At a time of debt and joblessness and so often hopelessness in this country, in a Foreclosure America where the President seems better at raising money than making very much for Americans, the question on Barack Obama ought to be this.
How can he possibly win a second term?
Only the way things are going with the Republicans, right up to Halloween 2011, and only a year out from the next election, you start to think a better question is, how can Obama lose?
Michele Bachmann was the front-runner for about five minutes, then Rick Perry was the front-runner, at least until Perry actually started talking, having all those nights in debates when you imagined him trying to answer brain-busters on “Are You Smarter Than a Fifth-Grader?”
Now the front-runner, according to some polls, is Herman Cain when it isn’t Mitt Romney. You keep thinking that Romney is the only one on the stage who looks like an actual nominee, or the next President. But somehow he can’t shake Cain, the rich pizza guy who keeps giving everybody the kind of show that Ross Perot did until the aliens came for Perot.
Trick or treat.
I was talking to one of the city’s political powerbrokers the other day, one who backed Obama last time and now thinks he has failed miserably as President. And I asked the guy for a scenario where the Republicans lose next November, now that Obama is running on his record and not George W. Bush’s.
“If their candidate somehow becomes more of an issue than the economy,” he said.
Suddenly Cain is in a virtual dead heat with Romney in Iowa, and all that means, at least for the time being, is that the Republican Party, which has had all this time to fall for Romney, or at least get behind him, still hasn’t. It is why Cain, who has no chance to get the nomination, whatever the polls say, none, is treated like a serious contender for no other reason than the guy won’t go away.
There Cain was on “Face the Nation” with Bob Schieffer on Sunday morning, clarifying his position on abortion for what felt like the ninth time, as if it is something else that ought to be included in his loopy 9-9-9 tax plan. By the way? Here is all you have to know about that plan. Perry’s flat tax makes more sense.
“I am pro-life from conception, period,” Cain said.
Bob Schieffer then reminded Cain that he had previously made statements about how he was pro-life except in cases of rape and incest.
“Pro-life from conception, period,” Cain said again, and then said that anything people thought he said to the contrary had been taken out of context. But then that is Cain’s game. Or act. When he has to walk back from some quote he thinks could hurt him, the quote was either taken out of context, or he was just kidding around.
“Some people are getting used to my sense of humor,” he said, perhaps thinking that when he talks about building an electrified border fence to keep out illegal aliens he was being funnier than Dick Gregory.
Apparently it is supposed to be the fault of the gotcha media that he told CNN this past week that he didn’t think the government should be in the position of telling a woman whether or not to have an abortion in cases of rape or incest. On that day Cain said, “What I’m saying is it ultimately gets down to a choice that the family or mother has to make.”
Maybe it makes perfect sense that some of these candidates have gone to Donald Trump, star of “Celebrity Apprentice,” looking for an endorsement, like in the end Trump will decide between Romney and Cain the way he once had to decide between Trace Adkins and Piers Morgan.
There is a reason why real smart people I know think that the best possible opponent for Barack Obama isn’t a Republican at all. It is still Hillary Clinton, since there are enough Democrats out there who think they might have nominated the wrong person last time.
For now, we are left with the Republican field we have, which Romney should already be dominating but is not. For now, the guy who thinks he can take on Obama straight up is neck and neck with Herman Cain.
Trick or treat, Republican style. They re the best show this Halloween, by far. All of them thinking they re dressed up like Presidents. Even the parade in the Village can t beat that.
D you believe any of the GOP presidential candidates can unseat President Obama?
Yes. Obama is vulnerable, and some of the Republicans have shown potential.
No. The GOP candidates are, for the most part, laughable.
More completely stupid commentary from people who are so mentally handicapped they cannot even find a real job and so end up as newspaper columnists.
They left out fourth option:
“No way Obama beats the Republican candidate.”
Lupica couldn’t even talk sports, and now he’s an expert on politics?
Lupixie ended up as a sportswriter. It just so happened that he couldn't write a Knicks column without mentioning Sarah Palin or Dick Cheney, so the News decided to share his stupidity with the rest of the paper. In this episode, Obama is a shoe-in because Democrats prefer Hillary Clinton.
Lupica always employs sarcasm thinking it wit. When he turns around and everyone in the room is nodding approval he thinks he’s just gotten off a corker. What a bore.
Lupica probably knows more about politics than he knows about baseball.
Which is next-to-nothing...
The truth is... obama will probably not lose reelection.
LLS
The truth is... obama will probably not lose reelection.
more please
Say... can I have some butter with that? The reason that I say that is because most of the gop leaders seem to want to lose. Their actions scream loser.
LLS
See, I would have just said that, instead of saying “Obama’s going to win” in the first place.
LLS
Baraq was a 53 percenter against McLame.
He’ll be a 42 percenter in 2012.
Enough for a landslide loss in a 2-way
or a Clintonian plurality win in a way
Baraq was a 53 percenter against McLame.
He’ll be a 42 percenter in 2012.
Enough for a landslide loss in a 2-way
or a Clintonian plurality win in a 3-way
Let’s try this another way: At the moment I see the only man in position to avoid the disaster you speak of as Newt Gingrich. No, I don’t agree with everything he says, and his personal life is a disaster. But he is best qualified among the current group of losers to fix the economy, restore or place in the world, solve the dysfunction in congress, and kick Obama’s ass in a debate. Unfortunately, if you mention Newt’s name on this debate you get attacked, but until a better choice presents itself, he’s my guy. If I could place a current candidate in the White House, it would be Rick Santorum, but I’m not delusional.
I wonder if the 0 really intends to run again— and if he does I wonder if his Pinko Fag Party will nominate him. My gut says they will put up Hillary —or anybody but the 0—but who am I to say? Best hope for the Republicans is to choose someone who knows who they are—and our American system of Government well enough to debate any Jack -or Jenny.
No, my only worry about causing a 3rd party is Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.