Replies

What I have heard, and completely agree with is that the methodology of measuring the heat generated is dubious.

That's a meme of the detractors. The excess heat has been measured in many hundreds of experiments using a variety of devices in many different institutions throughout the past 22 years.

That's a meme of the detractors.

Then why not fix it? lenr-canr.org goes on to mention how pathetic the 'instrumentation' is; and to call it 'insturmentation' is a truly pathetic term. When we calibrate theromcouples to a tenth of a degree C; the Rossi instrumentation cannot get within 20%. This is utter crap.

Why do this? You can buy thermocouples with precision well under 1% for less than a dollar each. Heck, I'm sure he could get his hands on a loaned data-logger for FREE (that's ZERO dollars USD) that would accurately measure hundreds of points at the same time.

Now, I want this to be real as much, and even possibly more than anyone else. But, one of the first things a person of moderate intelligence does, is remove questions. Make it as simple and straightforward as you can. Temperature probes on the exterior of the unit, will not tell you what is going on inside the unit - they will tell you where the heat is, how fast it heats, how fast it cools, when it heated, when it cooled - all very accurately and all with a timestamp from the milli-second range, to the month. Precise and accurate data collection should be among the easiest of things to accomplish; but as Rossi has opted to ignore these requests; they are going to continue to bite him in the butt. My question is simple "Why is he refusing to provide accurate and precise data?"