Posted on 10/28/2011 9:55:58 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
There is no better testament to the marketing prowess of Herman Cain than that he gets applause when he tells audiences he’s not a politician — in the course of seeking their votes for the highest political office in the land.
Mitt Romney plays a version of the same card, arguing that “career politicians got us into this mess, and they simply don’t know how to get us out."
If Cain and Romney think so poorly of politics as a vocation, they could easily save themselves from any further taint. They could drop their arduous schedules, their fundraising pleas, their very public roles that open them up to ridicule and attack, and return to comfortable lives that would be welcomed by the vast majority of Americans who don’t thirst after political distinction.
Of course, neither will fold up shop until it becomes impossible to go on, or he succeeds. They don’t have the courage of what they want us to believe are their anti-politician convictions.
Cain’s status as a non-officeholder is entirely an accident of the poor judgment of Republican primary voters in his state of Georgia. He ran for the nomination to the U.S. Senate in 2004. He lost. Had he won, he might well be in his seventh year and second term in the Senate, where politicians go to live out their days blissfully free of any serious responsibilities. Even politicians find the Senate stifling and unproductive, so it’s an odd place for Herman Cain — man of action and scourge of the politician — to have wanted to land.
Romney avoided becoming a career politician by a similar route. He ran for the U.S. Senate in Massachusetts in 1994 and lost, ran for governor of the state in 2002 and served one term before setting his sights on higher office, and ran for the Republican nomination for president in 2008 and lost. He’s been running for president ever since. All in all, he’s made a pretty good political career out of not being a career politician.
The business experience of a Cain or a Romney is enriching, no doubt. They are more impressive for it. But what will be more relevant if Romney becomes president, his time as management consultant or his time as governor of Massachusetts? Romney was a flawed candidate in 2008 and — by most accounts — is a better candidate now. That has everything to do with having acquired more political experience by passing through the fire of running for president once before.
Distaste with the political establishment shouldn’t become distaste for the act of officeholding. Consider the figures the Tea Party admires most. The tea-party standard-bearer Jim DeMint is a former three-term congressman and is now in his second term as a senator from South Carolina. The rising star Marco Rubio spent about ten years in the Florida legislature and served as speaker of the Florida house before winning election to the U.S. Senate in 2010. If business experience were all important, the successful former Goldman Sachs executive Jon Corzine would have been a blessing to New Jersey as governor, and his politico successor — former freeholder, candidate for the legislature, and U.S. attorney Chris Christie — a flat failure.
Amid the slings of outrageous fortune, the politician learns how to inspire and persuade, how to avoid unnecessary minefields and pick his fights, when to accommodate his opponents and when to confront them, how to build a coalition and keep it together. A businessman might have similar challenges, but they aren’t played out in the public arena in the context of a balky, democratic political system that rarely moves on the basis of one man’s orders.
And the businessman’s work doesn’t depend on a philosophical commitment to a set of ideas. The best politicians, like the non-businessman Ronald Reagan, translate their principles into reality in a way that rises to statesmanship. It’s not important not to be a politician; it’s important to be a really good one.
You can see it only because it’s in your cache; if you delete your cache, you’ll never see it again.
Grinchrich’s own is running right and governing left.
His term as speaker ruined our chances of shutting down the UN, and of ever ending socialism in the US.
OK - Thanks.
Nope. The flaw in your "logic" is the assumption that the Federal Government must be given double digit budget increases year in and year out.
It doesn't. It can, and must, get smaller. When Govt debt equals 100% GDP you MUST fix the broken tax and spend political system. You cannot just ignore it and hope the problem goes away.
We know how much you like establishment goons, but to see any irony in a citizen trying to fix the problems that your elitist owners made is a stretch.The We are badly mistaken. I see no irony in citizens wanting to fix problems. Either you missed the irony or it missed you.
There’s no irony there to miss; all that’s there for the author is a total lack of respect for his own credibility, if he has any left.
>> “It doesn’t. It can, and must, get smaller.” <<
.
Yes, it can, but that will require monitizing enough of the debt that the remainder can be paid down. That will have to have some inflationary effect, but how much is not predictable.
Oh, I agree that the government must be reduced in size.
But that is a different question entirely of what the fiscal impact of a particular tax scheme is.
Excellent idea. Let them contribute to a 401(k) like the rest of us who pull the load.
They wanted to make Washington king and he declined. Then they wanted to make him president for life and he declined that as well. The modern day examples of public "servants" who decline power offered to them are few and far between. J.Edgar Hoover was one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.