EDITORIAL: Obama’s pyrrhic Iraq victory

The Washington Times ^ | October 24, 2011 | Editorial

[pankot]

A re-election gambit by Zero.

[Cronos]

Iraq being attacked by IRan may be a very good thing for us. Already the Iranis are fed up with the ayatollahs. This would push them over the edge. Also, it would fire up the Islamic civil war between Sunnis and Shias again.

Mix up 1 and 2 and you have the Iranis rejecting Islam in hordes

All in all, a good thing...

[chiefqc]

It’s all about HIM and HIS re-election chances.

This is good for our brave hero’s to be coming home as mac daddy was not very supportive of them anyway.

Mac daddy could have do this three years ago but waited until it would assist HIM the most.

[SuziQ]

During the 2008 campaign, Mr. Obama proposed a withdrawal timeline with all troops out by the summer of 2010. “As I’ve said many times, we must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in,”

Obama's campaign boob bait for the liberal bubbas. I don't think six months of negotiations with the UN, before setting foot in Iraq, could by any stretch of the imagination considered 'careless getting in'.

[jazusamo]

I couldn’t agree more. Obama could care less about facts, everything he says is calculated and you can darn sure bet it’s said to enhance his future.