Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAIN ADDS TO '9-9-9' PLAN, ANGERING UNIONS
Fox News ^ | Published October 20, 2011 | James Rosen

Posted on 10/20/2011 4:12:40 PM PDT by marty60

Taking aim at minimum wage laws, union protections, and even local building codes, Herman Cain has put the finishing touches on the last missing piece of his signature “9-9-9” plan – an elaborate proposal to create “opportunity zones” in inner-city America that the GOP presidential candidate will unveil during a major campaign appearance in Detroit on Friday morning.

Cain hinted at the move during Tuesday night’s GOP debate in Las Vegas. He and his aides hope the details they provide about their plans to encourage growth in impoverished areas will deflect the surge of recent criticism branding “9-9-9” as unfair to the poor.

But details about the opportunity zone proposal, as obtained in advance by Fox News, will likely make “9-9-9” more, not less, controversial, particularly with organized labor.

To qualify for zone status under Cain’s plan, a given jurisdiction will have to enact policies the unions consider anathema – such as the elimination of the minimum wage, the provision of school vouchers, or the declaration of a zone as a “right-to-work” area.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 999
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: MNJohnnie

Thanks for the confirmation that even reading comprehension is above your paygrade.


81 posted on 10/20/2011 6:47:59 PM PDT by presently no screen name (NO OBAMITT in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: luckybogey
Good, why don't you let MNJohnnie read it too.

He insists that it was part of the Reagan Tax program.

Whether Cain's program is good or bad, it is not Reagan's program.

82 posted on 10/20/2011 6:48:29 PM PDT by World'sGoneInsane (Just because you say it doesn't make it true. By repeating it, just makes it propaganda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Plus he will insure that the Taxpayers pay even more for Welfare BENEs.


83 posted on 10/20/2011 6:49:23 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

- I used to be pro-choice. Now I’m staunchly pro-life.
- I used to be pro-public school. I ended up homeschooling for 8 years and I believe that the DOE should be killed along with the whole PS system - replaced with vouchers.
- I used to be pro-homosexual marriage. Now I’ll fight tooth-and-nail to defend traditional marriage.
- I used to be all about credit cards. Now I’m a Dave Ramsey fanatic.
- I used to be a Palestinian sympathizer. Now I am a Jew. I consider Israel my home.

People grow and opinions change as they get more information and exposure.

Cain talks openly about what brought about his conservative conversion. But I know from experience that such a conversion doesn’t come about over night. It’s taken me years to get where I am.


84 posted on 10/20/2011 6:51:59 PM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
I wonder if Clinton’s Empowerment zones were Laffers idea also.

You know, Laffer has on his resume that he was "Economic Adviser" to Reagan. A FR listed Reagan's economic advisers, and Laffer was not on it.

I double checked Reagan's library link and Laffer was not on it. I'll provide you a link separately. Check it out for yourself. I've got my doubts about Laffer.

85 posted on 10/20/2011 6:54:31 PM PDT by World'sGoneInsane (Just because you say it doesn't make it true. By repeating it, just makes it propaganda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/reference/ceastaff.html


86 posted on 10/20/2011 6:55:06 PM PDT by World'sGoneInsane (Just because you say it doesn't make it true. By repeating it, just makes it propaganda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Marie
I used to be pro-homosexual marriage

What year was that?
87 posted on 10/20/2011 6:56:15 PM PDT by presently no screen name (NO OBAMITT in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

Provide it to post #1 second line


88 posted on 10/20/2011 7:06:28 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: marty60

bookmark


89 posted on 10/20/2011 7:06:53 PM PDT by fightinJAG (NO REPRESENTATION WITHOUT TAXATION! Everyone should pay taxes, everyone should pay the same rate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane; marty60

Thanks but that wasn’t my quote. It was marty60


90 posted on 10/20/2011 7:10:25 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Reagan also gave amnesty to illegals. And he sold arms to Iran for hostages.

Not everything Reagan did was perfect.


91 posted on 10/20/2011 7:11:15 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

Upon further research, I was wrong:

November 29, 1982
ENTERPRISE ZONE UPDATE

INTRODUCTION

In his televised address to the nation just before the November elections, Ronald Reagan declared that passage of an enterprise zone bill was among his top priorities for the lame duck session of Congress.

Ever since he first announced commitment to the concept during the 1980 presidential campaign, Reagan has pressed for congressional action on the proposal, which is designed to revive inner city communities through the removal of government barriers to business enterprise. After considerable delay, caused mainly by disagreements between the Departments of Housing and Urban Development and Treasury, the Administration sent its legislative proposals to Capitol Hill in March 1982.

The Enterprise Zone Tax Act (H.R. 6009, S.2298) won the sponsorship of many legislators who had introduced their own versions of the concept—most notably Congressmen Jack Kemp (R-N.Y.) and Robert Garcia (D-N.Y.) By October it had attracted 129 bipartisan co-sponsors in the House and 28 in the Senate.

Yet the measure has languished in Congress. Despite its wide support among House Democrats, not a single Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee has co-sponsored the bill, and no formal hearings have been scheduled. As the Congressional Quarterly surmised, it appears that Committee leaders were “not anxious to hand Reagan another victory” before the November elections...

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1982/11/enterprise-zone-update


92 posted on 10/20/2011 7:16:37 PM PDT by luckybogey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

See #92


93 posted on 10/20/2011 7:18:44 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: marty60

>>>I don’t get the minimum wage thing though. If people aren’t making a living wage how do they survive.

High minimum wages keep out teenagers and hard to employ workers, increasing unemployment in the low end (starter) jobs. Think of illegal alien dishwashers who come and go, or the crop picking jobs.

And some union wage contracts have been pegged to a multiple of minimum wages.

Government should not try to set market wages. Such actions drive out marginal businesses and shut off learning benefits for marginal workers. If minimum wage laws are good, then they should set them for $1,000,000. Obviously, no one could afford workers at that level... they also can’t afford them at $7.25 (Texas for 2012).


94 posted on 10/20/2011 7:26:16 PM PDT by Hop A Long Cassidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: World'sGoneInsane

Laffer was a member of Reagan’s Economic Policy Advisory Board, which included, among others, Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=43243&st=advisory+board&st1=#axzz1bNXfBwkH


95 posted on 10/20/2011 7:26:16 PM PDT by Toskrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Netizen
Yep, it's the financially troubled again and they to decide that....would grant waivers to some failing public school systems.....many of whom do not have the economic means of attending better schools.....The voucher system, called the “Opportunity Scholarship Program,” allows students from financially troubled homes to attend private schools,

More of Cain's equality.
96 posted on 10/20/2011 7:28:45 PM PDT by presently no screen name (NO OBAMITT in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Hop A Long Cassidy

Yet some people actually have to survive and pay bills on minimum wage.


97 posted on 10/20/2011 7:29:18 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; Marie

Do you have a problem with a smart kid living in poverty getting a chance to attend a better school?

I’ll never forget when I was a kid. I must have been about 12 and we had this kid in class. He always came to school kind of grubby and his clothes were huge on him and he was pathetically skinny, but he was the smartest kid in class. He was a math wiz. I’ve always wondered whatever became of him.

I don’t have a problem with giving a voucher to a deserving kid. I do have a problem when it becomes an unearned quota. There is a huge difference.


98 posted on 10/20/2011 7:38:55 PM PDT by Netizen (Path to citizenship = Scamnesty. If you give it away, more will come. Who's pilfering your wallet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name; Netizen

The public school system is failing our children.

My husband had a decent job. Because of that, I had the privilege of staying home to educate our children.

After eight years of homeschooling, it was decided that it would be good for my daughter to spend some time in the public school system.

She did gain confidence. She gained the ability to argue with liberals. It did help here there.

Education? Not so much.

It’s pretty clear that the entire US public school system is a failed enterprise. The only solution is to dissolve the entire system and start over from scratch with free market solutions under local control. Let the people closest to the kids formulate their education.

The voucher system doesn’t pander to the ‘poor’. Every child benefits. The money is attached to the child, not to the school district. The parents chose their children’s school from a variety of options.

Cain’s end game is to do away with the DOE completely.

Just because he’s forcing the issue in a few particularly hard-hit areas doesn’t mean that he’s pandering to anyone. He’s using the same principle that brought us the national speed limit. You want federal goodies - you play our game.

Eventually, we need to move to a NATIONAL voucher program for every child. THAT is where he’s getting at. too many people are getting caught up in the transition and missing the end game.

Everything that Cain is presenting is a START.

Bachmann is for the Fair Tax system, but she has no idea how to get us there without destroying us. Cain sees the transition. He’s figured out ways to help us thrive as a nation while we work toward out ultimate goals.

In the end, it’s genius. We move hundreds of thousands of people off the tax-payer’s support. We motivate an entire generation toward self-sufficiency. We prove success in a few areas and strengthen our argument so that we can move the entire nation.

We all win.


99 posted on 10/20/2011 8:49:03 PM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Netizen

I think kids like that end up learning on their own anyway since their interest is so high in a particular area. He may not set the world on fire - he could be a math teacher and the best math teacher any could be. That’s success to me.

It brings to mind the guy behind me in grammar school who was not shabbily dressed at all. Clean/neat. Math was certainly his subject but he never paid attention. He would hide behind me and he would draw battleships and I could hear him blasting one off and then the other. He was amusing himself as he was totally bored with the class and probably could teach it just as good as the teacher if not better. On our weekly test he always scored a 100. I know the teacher knew he wasn’t paying attention but thankfully she wasn’t so dumb to call him on it. He scoring 100 says - he’s way ready for more difficult teaching than she could/would provide. Wonder what he is doing now.

Another classmate, a girl who was super bright and we all agreed she must have a photographic memory but never asked her. Years later I learned she studied Russian and became a Russian interpreter. Her parents were from Spain and often wondered how do people end up choosing their careers - something like that which is out of the ordinary.


100 posted on 10/20/2011 8:52:24 PM PDT by presently no screen name (NO OBAMITT in '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson