For later read .............. FRegards
Obama’s eligibility coverup ping....
gotta read ping!
This is huge and still in action. Please, everyone, email this to everybody and anyone you can think of to email it to. This cannot get buried. Freepers have the power to make something like this a big news story, as well it should be, if we work together. We must ping this idea of sending out emails to as many news origination and personalities as possible. Let’s Flood Them and keep it coming!!!!
Let’s say this became a big issue and disqualified Obama from running again (or caused the Dems not to back him for 2012), that would probably leave them with a Biden and Clinton choice.
I think the Dem voters would go for Clinton.... could she take the election from any Repub. in serious contention running now?
Bump
So in June of 2008 references to NBC were being scrubbed and a COLB was being created for release? Hmmmm
Thanks for the post. BTTT.
Thanks so much for bringing this to us.
This is right up the regimes alley as well.
It's what they do. Erase,blacken web pages,screw up stuff,reinterpret everything and then when they get caught will claim that its just a difference of opinion when its outright plagiarism,and as you state a re writing of the constitution by criminals.
Once they claim that its just a matter of opinion the DBM will go with that and it will take forever to prove the crimes. and as usual it will be all up to us to do it as well since no branch of govt. will support us they are all scared to death.
Once again thanks so much for posting this.
bttt and please add me to your ping list!
This is awesome news Danae but why isn’t it posted on the News/Activism thread where more people will see it?
“These surgical alterations would alter and shape the national dialogue; leaving a persistent and incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the ‘natural born citizen’ clause. There is no doubt whatsoever that this was the specific intent of those responsible for this illegal editing of American history and law.”
So after reading the article and the thread, let me see if I have this right. The allegation is that...
- Sometime prior to July 6, 2008, someone at Justia.com (possibly Obama-supporter Tim Stanley) decides that Minor v Happersett is detrimental to Obama.
- Justia decides to respond, but not by deleting the text of Minor v Happersett from its website.
- Instead, Justia removes references to the case name “Minor v Happersett” and its citation in the pre-1875 Supreme Court reporters (21 Wall 162).
- Then, in the place of the information it removed, Justia puts hyperlinks to the Minor v Happersett page on Justia.com, utilizing the more common U.S. Reports locations for that case (88 US 165).
- Then for some reason, Justia also does the same thing for other pre-1875 cases. So, in Luria, it also substitutes hyperlinks for case names for Osborn v. Bank of United States and for U.S. v. Babbitt.
- Then sometime prior to April 2010, Justia added back in the case names and original reporter numbers, but also retained the hyperlinks to the US Reporters.
- And Justia did all of this to hide the significance of Minor from the general public, even though it knew that this would have no effect on lawyers or actual legal experts, who use Lexis or Westlaw.
- And Justia also did all this to hide the significance of Minor, even though by replacing the case name with a direct hyperlink, it was actually making it EASIER and FASTER for readers to locate the Minor decision if they were reading Luria.
Frankly, I’m finding this all more than a bit inscrutable. If Justia wanted to scrub Minor, why would it ADD hyperlinks to the Minor decision? And why would it do the exact same thing for other pre-1875 decisions?
How would anyone even be impeded in researching ‘natural born citizenship’ by having *only* a direct hyperlink to the Minor decision, rather than a bare citation to “21 Wall. 162”?