JUST DO IT!
It would make their guy look bad.
simple as that.
The alphabet media is the propaganda arm of the Democratic/cpusa
“There would be no guns running to these Mexican cartels if the United States government hadn’t instituted a program to facilitate it.”
That is a ridiculous statement. I would bet only a small fraction of cartel guns come from the US. Why get semi-automatic guns from the US when they can get machine guns from Central/South America, or from other countries?
They DO care about dead Mexicans.
In fact, I’d be willing to bet that three out of four of those dead Mexicans will be voting for Obama in the next election....
Because dead Mexicans can’t vote. Well...maybe in Chicago.
Compare the media’s concern about the Mexicans on American death rows with the Mexicans killed with the assistance of the Holder Justice Department.
Running guns to cartel enemies of Mexico is an act of war against Mexico.
Having both Americans and Mexicans killed is at best: grossly negligent homicide and accomplice to murder.
Where is the headline that says: Obama Murder Hundreds of Mexicans!
Running guns to cartel enemies of Mexico is an act of war against Mexico.
Having both Americans and Mexicans killed is at best: grossly negligent homicide and accomplice to murder.
Where is the headline that says: Obama Murders Hundreds of Mexicans!
Watergate didn’t rack up that kind of body count.
Sarah Palin’s daughter’s boyfriend’s mother, or whatever stupid story they were chasing around Wasilla for months, that didn’t rack up a body count.
The New York Times cares about dead third world people when the dead can be used as a tool to hurt conservative Americans.
The deaths of these Mexican citizens might make a liberal elite look bad... ping
For the FreeRepublic "banglist", please click HERE .
Because liberals are racists?
Because dead Mexicans [in Mexico] wouldn’t have voted for The Won anyway? They have enough dead people and non-US-citizen Mexicans here who already vote that they’re satisfied.
To: marktwainAccording to the Forbes article, the Mexican DA has a list of over 200 Mexican citizens killed by the guns from this program. Plus a couple US law enforcement men.Abu Ghraib got 46 straight NYTimes front pages for naked flesh piles and a scary mean dog. How many front pages does 200 dead Mexicans merit?
It is NOT “hundreds” of dead Mexicans —that is the Mexican AG’s number, which only counts those F&F guns found around the LAST victims of those guns.
The REAL number —the once cited by the son of the Sinaloa Cartel is THREE THOUSAND.
The left claims to care enough about Mexy crossers to put drinking & aid stations in the desert, why are they so flamboyantly thumb-sucking HERE?
Yes, ObaMubage is their doe-eyed Cabana-boy, fine. The POINT is that the Establishment Media be made to PAY A PRICE for ignoring this.
Their intransigence has to be milked for all it’s worth —the RINOs should be taking out TV ads in prime Ghetto time in the US Southwest on Telemundo, etc. —ObaMugabe’s 2012 number should be ZERO. They should be screaming their heads off in Spanish about how this Crips in a crispSuit is offing their heffes in desert shootouts.
“Why don’t CNN, NPR, NY Times care about ‘dead Mexicans’?”
Because live ones don’t vote in US elections?
Sounds like a great title for an Ann Coulter book about F&F:
“Who Cares About Dead Mexicans?”
Because the president's name has a "(D)" after it.