RE: No, he very unsubtly implied it. He knows that it isn’t the “Perry Ranch”, but it didn’t stop the smear.
Nope, never got that impression. He said the use of the word is insensitive. That’s all.
I never got the impression that he even IMPLIED that Perry was racist.
Cain said he would have defended the soldier, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT HE WOULD DEFEND THE POLICY OF REPEALING DADT.
How I know that ? HE HAS SAID ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS THAT HE IS FOR REINSTATING DADT AND SAID SO EVEN ON THE WEBSITE I PROVIDED.
Cain supports men who defend this country, that does not mean that he supports all of their misguided beliefs.
Here is what Herman said...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN4JE0-HwgU
He took the bait hook line and sinker and smeared Perry willingly.
The sodomite life style is far more than a misguided belief. Those in the lifestyle destroy institutions and cultures. You might get a copy of The Pink Swastika.
As for his comment on the phony story on Perry, I disagree with you entirely. I think Herman thinks he has a shot at the nomination now and felt the innuendo would help push a competitor out of the way. He should have gotten the facts and stood up for Perry and against the racial smear machine. That would have been the right thing to do, and it would have done far more to advance his campaign than what he did.