Posted on 09/30/2011 4:58:50 PM PDT by americanophile
Today in Yemen, U.S. air strikes killed American citizen Anwar Al-Aulaqi. Al-Aulaqi has never been charged with a crime. Last year, the ACLU and Center for Constitutional Rights represented Al-Aulaqi's father in a lawsuit challenging the government's asserted authority to carry out "targeted killings" of U.S. citizens located far from any armed conflict zone. We argued that such killings violate the Constitution and international law, but the case was dismissed in federal court last December.
In response to today's killing of Al-Aulaqi, ACLU Deputy Legal Director Jameel Jaffer said:
The targeted killing program violates both U.S. and international law. As we've seen today, this is a program under which American citizens far from any battlefield can be executed by their own government without judicial process, and on the basis of standards and evidence that are kept secret not just from the public but from the courts. The government's authority to use lethal force against its own citizens should be limited to circumstances in which the threat to life is concrete, specific, and imminent. It is a mistake to invest the President — any President — with the unreviewable power to kill any American whom he deems to present a threat to the country. In a hearing before a federal court last November, government lawyers argued the president should have unreviewable authority to kill Americans he has unilaterally determined to pose a threat. As National Security Project Litigation Director Ben Wizner added today: "If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the President does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state."
(Excerpt) Read more at aclu.org ...
He was not the first American who was wanted dead or alive...
http://www.johnniedillinger.freeservers.com/about.html
There were American citizens fighting on the side of Germany during WWII. We shot and bombed them with the rest of the Nazis. If American want to fight on the side of the enemy, they are traitors and will die with them. The Constitution was never intended to protect them or non-citizen aliens.
Thank goodness the courts weren’t involved. There would have been an indefinite stay on this justified execution
The ACLU doesn’t want ANYONE executed, no matter how many people they have murdered. Well, no one except unborn babies.
“Unfortunately ‘enemy combatant’ is something of an (inexact) invention, and surely doesn’t trump the Constitution”
Tell that to the deceased. Go give comfort to his grieving family
Just another case of suicide by drone.
It was just like, be careful crossing the street, you might get run over by a truck. He was just plain careless. Substitute the word drone.
They still aren't. They're just schools with teachers and such administrators as a school might need. They do not make public policy.
So, a school run by a bunch of perverts decided a kid couldn't say he didn't care for homosexuality? That got undone quite quick. Now that the whole bunch are uncovered do you imagine they'll try it again?
Guess we know which side the ACLU is on.
Simply because he successfully evaded delivery of a summons doesn't make him immune from further applications of real force.
You’ll keep denying the rights of a citizen until you’re the last one standing. So be it.
We didn’t kill the sob in Dearborn for exercising his free speech rights. He was killed on foreign soil waging war against the USA. Where is that a violation of anything? Yemen might have cause to bitch, but they’re not
Such as? Especially a "such as" that does not overly endanger our forces. Seems to me he renounced his citizenship. No one worried about all the Southern boys who were killed without Due Process in the unpleasantness of the 1860s. Why? They had taken up arms against the United States. So had this scum bag.
Such as? Especially a "such as" that does not overly endanger our forces. Seems to me he renounced his citizenship. No one worried about all the Southern boys who were killed without Due Process in the unpleasantness of the 1860s. Why? They had taken up arms against the United States. So had this scum bag.
Did they keep trying to make same sex marriage legal? How about abortion? How about no praying in school or any religious references? Once Christianity is illegal you will also be a enemy combatant.
Wanted, dead or alive. Check out the legality of that
If he'd quit robbing banks and settled down properly he'd lived to a good long life. But, he was an idiot. Preferred the bright lights and easy women of Chicago ~ like Obama.
He and his fellow private militiamen wouldn't stay in one place long enough for a warrant to be served. They had to be shot in the field.
These people bellyaching about this guy and his misguided buddies getting killed in Yemen have probably never had a real bandit close to them.
The cold, hard fact is the professional bandits must be killed. They are too dangerous for civilized life.
We should have simply tried him for treason in absentia
Why? So some *ickhead lawyers get a paycheck at taxpayers expense? He was wanted dead or alive. We got him the good way, and it was legal without lawyers and judges ruling on it
They've strayed beyond the constitution into trivial municipal codes. The Congress is authorized by the constitution to restrict jurisdiction ~ whatever that might mean.
Save the sanctimonious BS for someone else. Read LOAC, then get back to me. If you are offended by the jihadi's death there is a legal recourse. When some Christian in America not bearing arms against it gets whacked by a hellfire get back to me, you'll have a case. Just 'declaring' someone a 'enemy combatant' doesn't cut it. Killing this POS was Constitutional.
Keep in mind this - our current government thinks gun owners who believe in the Constitution may be terrorists. Want them bombing cabins on some pretense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.