Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Show Thread - Wednesday, September 28, 2011
The EIB Network ^ | 09/28/2011 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 09/28/2011 8:11:01 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan

AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and he’s not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name (that’s Rush, for those in Rio Linda),the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back — just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! America’s anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo (a little Spanish lingo, there). He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to do—that’s host. Get ready to what you were born to do—that’s listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: advertising guy

Just got back to hear Rush discussing the GOP deferring to the USSC regarding Obamacare. Yep, it was so successful to take this same approach to McCain-Feingold.....

ooops


141 posted on 09/28/2011 11:24:15 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
i disagree

i don't think bachmann is a liar

142 posted on 09/28/2011 11:25:45 AM PDT by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Yup.

I predict it will pass the SC.


143 posted on 09/28/2011 11:26:03 AM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

I also have to say I find it a bit disconcerting that the Supreme Court would rule on any issue emotionally. That is wrong no matter which side is applying it.


144 posted on 09/28/2011 11:27:36 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

the dyke said durin conformation she would recuse if


145 posted on 09/28/2011 11:27:52 AM PDT by advertising guy (the U.S.A. is # 1 in the world in collective son of a bitches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

I fear you are correct, since it all hinges on Kennedy, who is nothing more than a glorified Souter.


146 posted on 09/28/2011 11:29:19 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (A kid like Prescott & still pro-life all the days of his life. President Reagan was truly a saint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: CSM

it is unconstitutional and for the supremes to allow it dents the constitution for a lifetime

ain’t gonna happen


147 posted on 09/28/2011 11:30:30 AM PDT by advertising guy (the U.S.A. is # 1 in the world in collective son of a bitches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

i remember that

hope she keeps her word


148 posted on 09/28/2011 11:30:37 AM PDT by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

That explains why the Warren court and Justice Brennen especially were so wrong about soooo much. ;)


149 posted on 09/28/2011 11:31:11 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (A kid like Prescott & still pro-life all the days of his life. President Reagan was truly a saint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy
she would recuse if Purple pigs fly outta my ..?
150 posted on 09/28/2011 11:31:24 AM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: sloop

I agree Bachmann would like to but she doesn’t have the wherewithal to accomplish it as president. Her best job is to remain in the house and work to repeal it there but we’ll need a president that will lead on this issue.


151 posted on 09/28/2011 11:32:21 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan
aight - if the dyke recuses herself and the vote is 4/4, does the lower court ruling stand? (being only the individual mandate is tossed)
152 posted on 09/28/2011 11:32:41 AM PDT by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

depends of the definition of the word pigs

lol


153 posted on 09/28/2011 11:32:46 AM PDT by advertising guy (the U.S.A. is # 1 in the world in collective son of a bitches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

I agree with your analysis, however, with Kennedy being the swing vote, I am fear the “good guys” lose this one.


154 posted on 09/28/2011 11:32:57 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (A kid like Prescott & still pro-life all the days of his life. President Reagan was truly a saint!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: sloop

The idea that once this is implemented that there is no going back because it is an entitlement is bull. If it is illegal then it is stopped and swept away. Are some going to be hurt? Possibly. The Constitution did not prohibit slavery so it was a right of plantation owners to own slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation and the subsequent Constitutional amendments took all of their “entitlement” to slaves away. If der Fuehrer signed a bill tomorrow that muslims are entitled to invoke sharia law and perform honor killings would it mean that it could not be swept away because it is unconstitutional and illegal. Illegal and unconstitutional have meaning. We as a country could do away with SS, medicare or any other entitlement. This is all about politicians not wanting to piss off some constituency that they or someone else has lied to.


155 posted on 09/28/2011 11:33:16 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

When at least 3 of them WANT exactly that — for the Constituion to be “dented”...?


156 posted on 09/28/2011 11:33:19 AM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
bachmann is the ONLY one fighting obamacare
157 posted on 09/28/2011 11:34:24 AM PDT by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

Yep


158 posted on 09/28/2011 11:35:11 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

Kennedy is exactly who I had in mind.....these Supremes know the very seriesness of this......and emotional decisions would make a Supreme a laughin stock for life

Kennedy wants to be important ,not a laughin stock


159 posted on 09/28/2011 11:36:10 AM PDT by advertising guy (the U.S.A. is # 1 in the world in collective son of a bitches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950
the scotus defines legal and illegal - no matter what anyone thinks

we need courts that will rule on the law and stop worshiping at the altar of precedent

160 posted on 09/28/2011 11:37:14 AM PDT by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson