Skip to comments.
Woman decapitated in Mexico for web posting
Associated Press ^
| Sept. 24, 2011
| MARK STEVENSON
Posted on 09/24/2011 8:45:38 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
MEXICO CITY (AP) -- Police found a woman's decapitated body in a Mexican border city on Saturday, alongside a handwritten sign saying she was killed in retaliation for her postings on a social networking site.
The gruesome killing may be the third so far this month in which people in Nuevo Laredo were killed by a drug cartel for what they said on the internet.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mexicodrugcartels
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: Gene Eric
good then we think alike on executing major drug dealers. Dealing the stuff beyond marijuana, not that marijuana is benign
61
posted on
09/25/2011 1:42:26 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(nzt - works better if you're already smart)
To: Sun
Forget that...annex Mexico and send our armies in to clean out those narco rats nests. Since Mexicans want to be Americans so much, lets just go ahead and Make Mexico a part of America...under our constitution!
62
posted on
09/25/2011 1:47:50 AM PDT
by
mdmathis6
(Christ came not to make mankind into God but to put God into men!)
To: Gene Eric
My dad was far more conniving than I.
He knew my inclinations well enough that he did not want my first ride to be a V8 sports car.
I wound up with a freaking Gremlin.
*sigh*
[but I’ve more than made up for it since then]....;D
I’ll never forget the look on his face when he asked if driving 55mph on the Harley wasn’t too cold.
I said no but it does get a bit nippy over 100.
I thought he was going to faint.
I’d never actually *seen* all the color drain out of anybody’s face, before.
[he shoulda let me keep the Hawk...maybe I’d have “gotten it out of my system” years ago....uh.....naaah!]
63
posted on
09/25/2011 2:04:53 AM PDT
by
Salamander
(Alice Cooper hit me with a stick.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Just a few items that have been outsourced to Mexico....
most of your Halloween candy...(look on the back of the package)
...most of your hair coloring products
...a lot of your cookie and candy products...ie, Fig Newtons, York chocolate....
I will not buy Mexican.....not with the continuous headlines of illegals, drug cartels and decapitations/gruesome murders, and their attitude toward the US....UGH!
I personally cannot imagine a high standard concerning our products made there and sold back to us!
Why are we doing this!
64
posted on
09/25/2011 4:44:35 AM PDT
by
Guenevere
(....)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; High-tech Redneck; RaceBannon
I think y’all missed the sarcasm in Bannon’s post.
65
posted on
09/25/2011 4:46:41 AM PDT
by
Guenevere
(....)
To: Free ThinkerNY; All
Government is for lining the pockets of those in power.
If either the Mexican or the US bureaucracies actually did anything about the drug problems where would they get all of that War On Drugs money to siphon off?
They'd lose a lot of cash and head count.
None of the Drug Warriors want the problem to go away or even lessen.
They depend on it for jobs.
66
posted on
09/25/2011 5:02:05 AM PDT
by
Notary Sojac
(Nothing will cure the economy but debt deleveraging, deregulation, and time.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Legalizing drugs won't give us less abuse of narcotics.
We will end up with more people living under the influence of drugs throughout out society.
The junkies' children will be our collective problem.
Our fellow workers on the job will jeopardize OUR safety and well-being through their irresponsible drug abuse. A lot of jobs demand clear, sober thinking in life-or-death situations.
More stoned drivers will be behind the wheel of automobiles.
Legalizing drugs does not address the problem of people abusing drugs and choosing irresponsible behavior to the detriment of all of society.
Do you want nurses, doctors, electricians, plumbers, truck drivers, forklift operators, teachers, day-care workers, school bus drivers, or bank tellers STONED when they do their jobs?
67
posted on
09/25/2011 5:17:53 AM PDT
by
NoControllingLegalAuthority
(Where is the middle ground on insolvency of the United States government?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum; NoControllingLegalAuthority
Can anyone list how legislation of morals ever seriously worked? Oh and by the way we know prohibition was a huge success for whom? The dealers of course! Ask old man Kennedy where he made his money.
68
posted on
09/25/2011 5:40:21 AM PDT
by
Utah Binger
(Southern Utah where INVITED Freepers will meet again next summer. Jim Robinson Too)
To: HiTech RedNeck; Yehuda; firebrand; BlackElk; ELS
well, I bet the sun dont shine in your butt, I’ll put them there
Oh, Wait, libertarians already want to do that, sorry
Oh, Wait, so do democrats
Hey, just what IS the difference between democrats and libertarians on social issues? Isn’t it true that libertarians just use more colorful language even though they believe the same things as liberals on social issues?
I mean, Libertarians and democrats only differ on so-called fiscal economics, everything else they are identical.
help me out here...
69
posted on
09/25/2011 5:54:40 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
To: RaceBannon
70
posted on
09/25/2011 6:08:27 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(para bellum)
To: Free ThinkerNY
They already have Net Neutrality in Mexico?
71
posted on
09/25/2011 6:23:21 AM PDT
by
Leep
To: Gene Eric
Give the right to summarily execute a dealer to the young, Id happily dispense with the War on Drugs.
Oxymoronic, much? What do you call executing drug dealers? Garsh, sounds a lot like a "war on drugs". Call it a different name if you want, but it's still the same battle. So, let's be clear. You ARE in a favor of a "War on Drugs", you just want it fought differently than is currently being waged.
72
posted on
09/25/2011 7:10:53 AM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: expat1000
Its a tempting solution to grasp at, but is not clearly thought through. Street crime would go up, not down, because now you would have even more psychopaths out there that cannot support themselves, and need to find the money for guns, bling, street rides,and all the other necessities of life for gang-bangers and thugs.
You obviously overlooked the easy solution for all of this. You see those that want an end to the "War on Drugs" do realize that usage would skyrocket, so to keep the millions of new druggies from committing crimes for their fixes, they want the government do distribute drugs for FREE. Of course, NOTHING is actually free, so, yes, they want you and I to pay for the state-produced meth that will destroy millions of lives and cripple society. But, hey, at least we ended the War on Drugs.
/sarc
73
posted on
09/25/2011 7:23:12 AM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: Salamander
You're right about many people using drugs to “tune out”. This culture is enforced by the popularity of abusing alcohol, a mind-deadening drug.
However, many drugs actually allow you to “tune in” and interpret reality in such ways that it opens your mind to a deeper understanding of reality, yourself, and those close to you. I think it's an outright crime to completely prohibit psychedelic research and therapy. For example, MDMA (Ecstasy) was actually released as an Rx drug and used very successfully in therapy until a few people started abusing it to "tune out". It is still used successfully in secret by many therapists.
Read my old post on this topic:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2780984/posts?page=7#7
74
posted on
09/25/2011 7:48:22 AM PDT
by
varyouga
To: GLDNGUN
I typed up a reply, then found something far more eloquent than I could ever compose:
My Name: "Is Meth" I destroy homes, I tear families apart, take your children, and that's just the start.
I'm more costly than diamonds, more precious than gold, The sorrow I bring is a sight to behold.
If you need me, remember I'm easily found, I live all arou nd you - in schools and in town
I live with the rich; I live with the poor, I live down the street, and maybe next door.
I'm made in a lab, but not like you think, I can be made under the kitchen sink.
In your child's closet, and even in the woods, If this scares you to death, well it certainly should.
I have many names, but there's one you know best, I'm sure you've heard of me, my name is crystal meth.
My power is awesome; try me you'll see, But if you do, you may never break free.
Just try me once and I might let you go, But try me twice, and I'll own your soul.
When I possess you, you'll steal and you'll lie, You do what you have to -- just to get high.
The crimes you'll commit for my narcotic charms Will be worth the pleasure you'll feel in yo ur arms.
You'll lie to your mother; you'll steal from your dad, When you see their tears, you should feel sad.
But you'll forget your morals and how you were raised, I'll be your conscience, I'll teach you my ways.
I take kids from parents, and parents from kids, I turn people from God, and separate friends.
I'll take everything from you, your looks and your pride, I'll be with you always -- right by your side.
You'll give up everything - your family, your home, Your friends, your money, then you'll be alone.
I'll take and take, till you have nothing more to give, When I'm finished with you, you'll be lucky to live.
If you try me be warned - this is no game, If given the chance, I'll drive you insane.
I'll ravish your body, I'll control your mind, I'll own you completely, your soul will be mine.
The nightmares I'll give you while lying in bed, The voices you'll hear, from inside your head.
The sweats, the shakes, the visions you'll see, I want you to know, these are all gifts from me.
But then it's too late, and you'll know in your heart, That you are mine, and we shall not part.
You'll regret that you tried me, they always do, But you came to me, not I to you.
You knew this would happen, many times you were told, But you challenged my power, and chose to be bold.
You could have said no, and just walked away, If you could live that day over, now what would you say?
I'll be your master, you will be my slave, I'll even go with you, when you go to your grave.
Now that you have me, what will you do? Will you try me or not? It's all up to you.
I can bring you more misery than words can tell, Come take my hand, let me lead you to hell.
(This was written by a young Indian girl who was in jail for drug charges, and was addicted to meth. She wrote this while in jail. As you will soon read, she fully grasped the horrors of the drug, as she tells in this simple, yet profound poem. She was released from jail, but, true to her story, the drug owned her. They found her dead not long after, with the needle still in her arm.)
Please keep praying for our Children, Teens, Young adults, understand, this thing is worse than any of us realize...
http://www.d-fy-it.org/i_am_meth.htm
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Legalizing drugs won't give us less abuse of narcotics. Answer my question that you ignored before; do you believe in abolishing Constitutional rights in the name of the war on drugs, specifically asset forfeiture laws that allow corrupt drug cops(a preponderance of them are corrupt) to confiscate your property without due process of law?
Simple question. Answer it.
76
posted on
09/25/2011 8:16:58 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Palin is coming, and the Tea Party is coming with her.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“But if you like having drug cartels with more weapons than their governments, you got it.”
Along with:
Millions of otherwise law-abiding Americans in jail, meaning they consume taxes rather than pay them.
Hundreds of billions of dollars absolutely and completely wasted, adding to our current deficit woes.
Confiscation of private property AS A GOVERNMENT PROFIT CENTER over the thinnest excuses.
“No knock” raids that regularly kill innocent people and pets.
An almost unlimited expansion of American authoritarianism along with continual erosion of privacy and civil rights.
It boggles my mind that so few see the “solution” is far worse than the “problem”. Prosecute people for crimes that affect others, not personal choices. Continue to expand personal carry so people can defend themselves instead of relying on a “never there when you need ‘em” police force. And above all, educate people on the actual, proven risks of drugs instead of over-the-top propaganda that knowledgeable people laugh at.
77
posted on
09/25/2011 8:43:42 AM PDT
by
PreciousLiberty
(Palin '12 - Take Back America!!!)
To: expat1000
That’s not fair, if they made Meth legal, all of that would go away!
And you get a free pony, too!
78
posted on
09/25/2011 9:29:22 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
here’s an even simpler one:
Do you believe in common sense or words games about the abuses of drugs that has absolutely zero to do with how much it costs or whether it is legal?
79
posted on
09/25/2011 9:30:32 AM PDT
by
RaceBannon
(Ron Paul is to the Constitution what Fred Phelps is to the Bible.)
keith olbermann would say “no, there are no beheadings, it is all made up by the arizona governor”
80
posted on
09/25/2011 9:56:35 AM PDT
by
isom35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson