Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: Perry 31, Romney 24, Paul 13, Bachmann … 5
Hotair ^ | 09/19/2011 | Allahpundit

Posted on 09/20/2011 10:11:50 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck

Yes, I agree. I don’t really like Perry very much but this may be an image thing because of his “TV preacher hair.” He comes across as a little on the phony side, although I don’t really think he is.

Back in the 80s, Reagan also often struck me as a phony, although he was not. It was simply because of his actor’s voice and manner.

At that point, there were enough people who liked this image to vote for him and get him into office. I don’t know whether Perry has this crowd or not .

You never know what is going to appeal to voters. Obama keeps trying to find it, which is why his accent goes from whiney Chicago university adjunct to boyz in da hood in no time at all.

Perry needs a few cosmetic touches. He’s got to get his hair cut a little shorter, look a little more modern, and actually attack the Dems, presenting the image of small government in contrast to their ugly vision of the government sitting in your kitchen, your bedroom and your bank account.


21 posted on 09/20/2011 10:58:51 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: livius

I ain’t voting.

______________________________________________________
Granted, we have a paltry selection to run against Obama, but choosing any of these candidates, even Huntsman, would be better than not voting. If we are to survive as a country, he must go, and that means voting, for someone! If you stay home, you can never complain about 4 more years of our current POTUS. And you will wake up 4 years later to a country you won’t even recognize. You think he wants to “fundamentally change” our country? Just give him 4 more years and see what he does.


22 posted on 09/20/2011 11:04:07 AM PDT by NotTallTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NotTallTex

Not really.

I’ve held my nose and voted for sucky candidates...and they never win. Romney won’t win because he sure as heck doesn’t have any support among people who will actually go out and work for a candidate (at least here in Florida).

When I was sitting at the phone banks during the McCain candidacy, I begged people to go out and vote for McCain because it was our only chance, and in any case, he was elderly and Palin was his VP.

He’s still with us, still an Obama supporter, and Palin has flaked off.

For once, we have to find a candidate people don’t have to hold their noses to vote for...or not vote at all, which is exactly what I would do if Romney were the candidate.


23 posted on 09/20/2011 11:11:33 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
I wish Steve Forbes was a candidate. Looks like I will vote for generic Republican in 2012. The best case scenario, that I see, is to have a Conservative Congress with a mediocre president who won't veto the legislation.

It would be nice if we could replace Boehnor.

24 posted on 09/20/2011 11:11:49 AM PDT by Cheap_Hessian (I am the Grim FReeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

I still support Bachmann. Perry is a compromise candidate with a deal-breaker position on illegal immigration.


25 posted on 09/20/2011 11:12:03 AM PDT by timbelmont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Well I am encouraged that Cain is polling as well as Bachmann. Would be nice to have just Cain with Bachmann throwing him her support.

Then it would be interesting to see what happens when Palin doesn’t announce.


26 posted on 09/20/2011 11:15:27 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! “10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

I have almost no doubt that I will not be voting at this point.

The good-looking big-corporate men, Perry and Romney are what most Republicans are falling for.

Either one of them will allow the Feral government to grow and grow and grow... only a little bit slower than Obammy did.

Government-mandated this, government required that, that’s all I see coming from them.

They are no more conservative than a Blue-dog democrat.

Getting all kissy-huggy with mooslimbs, allowing the sodomite agenda to quietly keep developing more power, forgetting to get the government off the backs of small business, it will be infuriating politics as usual, even if Repubs take over both Houses. Because the President won’t be as conservative as the Congress. And Dems and liberals and commies know this, which is why they want those guys in office. They can still rile up the far-left base, because the guy has an R by his name, calling them fascists, etc. But, all the while, in truth, it’s “let’s make a deal” in all the backrooms - or coffee shops - of washington.

COMPLETELY DISGUSTING.

The small business owner can go __________ I guess.

That’s nice, thanks Perry and Romney. Thanks Republican county committees. Thanks for doing the “sensible” thing and selected a good looking guy with nice hair who is “electable”. I’m sure they’ll stand real strong on principle when it counts. When Europe goes bankrupt, when some “other military power” starts throwing their weight around in a bigger way. Keep makin’ deals. Nice...

Maybe we should nominate Sam Malone. Can we convince him to be a Republican ?


27 posted on 09/20/2011 11:17:35 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We need to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
From her positive comments about him in the debates since Perry got in, I expect if Bachmann left the race today she'd support Romney.

In theory, healthcare costs shouldn't go up because of Gardasil if it eliminates the far more expensive need for cancer treatments. Premiums would go up regardless. Prevention savings don't seem to be realized when it comes to premiums. There's always a new excuse found for needing more money.

28 posted on 09/20/2011 11:21:45 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Will racist demagogue Andre Carson be censured by the House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Complicating the picture is that not every case of HPV caught results in a cancer case, let alone a death. Remember how syphilis used to be such a frightening venereal disease because there was no way to combat the bacteria — then penicillin put a screeching halt to that problem? Why did HPV related cancer seize the limelight as a venereal disease of concern only after Gardasil and similar products saw the light of day?

I’d say better to permit insurers to give a discount to women who have had an HPV immunization at their own cost.


29 posted on 09/20/2011 11:29:10 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Is Romney better, even in claimed principle, on the immigration and national sovereignty issue than is Perry? That’s the chief way that Bachmann outshines Perry.


30 posted on 09/20/2011 11:30:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

I think Bachmann will support Romney, although it’s really a pity. I saw her speak once and she was great, but apparently she hired a consultant who told her all the wrong things. That said, she should have had enough vision on her own to tell the consultant to go jump in a lake.

One thing I didn’t like about her was that I felt she (like Palin) was waiting for “permission,” although I wasn’t very clear on where this permission was going to come from. When I saw her speak in DC, she had great ideas and seemed to be speaking from what she knew. But more and more, she’s turned into a “candidate,” but since she never had her own program very clear, exactly what she was running on got a little blurry and obviously lost the public interest.

That said, Romney has bunches of bucks and he can buy this election. Perry has some monied backers, but I think people like Palin, Cain and Bachmann have none, and there was probably little chance that they would emerge as candidates.


31 posted on 09/20/2011 11:30:42 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

Will be much more comfortable when the third tier candidates start dropping out if their votes do not go to Romney.


There’s third-tier then there’s third-tier. Bachmann’s votes will most likely go to Romney (except those who just cannot get over the Gardisil affair). So will Cain’s, Newt’s and Santorum’s. That’s probably around 10% all put together. Huntsman and the fool from Michigan together have probably less than 2% which will go to Romney.


32 posted on 09/20/2011 11:47:21 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I meant Bachmann’s and the others will most likely go to Perry.


33 posted on 09/20/2011 11:48:35 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: throwback

Would you be better of today under McCain/Palin? I don’t know the answer to that.


34 posted on 09/20/2011 11:54:00 AM PDT by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Apparently many libs, including my step-daughter, have got it in their heads that southern, non-Mormon Pubbies won’t vote for Romney (against Obama) because he’s a Mormon. Now, I’m not a Romney fan, but if it comes down to Romney or Obama, there is no choice. I would assume most southern Pubbies feel the same.


35 posted on 09/20/2011 12:46:13 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: livius
When the primary finally came to Wisconsin in 2008, McCain was already the nominee. He wasn't my choice, but there was nothing I could do about it. He was still far preferable to Obama, and we'd have millions of currently unemployed Americans with jobs if McCain had won.

Romney is not my favorite either, but if it comes down to Romney or Obama there is no choice. Sometimes life is not about making the best choice but the least worst choice.

36 posted on 09/20/2011 12:52:06 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Romney is by far our best bet in 2012

Perry is a less likable, less restrained, less intelligent GWB, plus all the NWO bs.


37 posted on 09/20/2011 12:55:21 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: The flash mob who wonÂ’t leave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote; lormand; Allegra; Dr. Sivana; fieldmarshaldj
You can't be serious. Romney is not to be trusted any further than you or I could physically throw the Rocky Mountains. You certainly cannot trust him on taxes. You cannot trust him NOT to give corrupt business interests the keys to the government. You cannot trust him to abandon an entire lifetime of being a whore for big business interests. He is a perfect foil for Obozo's faux populist themes. He is a corporate raider who specializes in exporting jobs. He is a second generation idiot in national GOP affairs. He cannot be trusted on guns, on babies, on protecting our society from sexually perverted anything goes, on standing up for a militant American sovereignty in foreign policy, on eliminating national Obozo/Romneycare. Like Romney, perhaps you don't regard any of those issues as important. After all, he WOULD take verrrrry good care of the windtunnel trust fund babies down at the polo club, the yacht club and the Junior League.

Romney's nomination would permanently destroy the Republican Party for all of the foregoing reasons since his nomination would signal GOP capitulation on all of the foregoing issues which are far more important than whatever pittance of issues on which he MIGHT be neutral or verrrrry mildly positive. The conservative movement has come a very great distance, too much of one to sit still for an elitist quisling like Mittens.

BTW, I have not chosen a candidate but I absolutely know that my candidate will NOT be Ron Paul, Mitt Romney or John Huntsman. I don't have to vote until March, 2012 in a primary and I can take my time on the rest.

38 posted on 09/20/2011 1:57:55 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote; lormand; Allegra; Dr. Sivana; fieldmarshaldj
Glock the Vote:

#38 was directed to you. I pinged the others for their info.

39 posted on 09/20/2011 2:01:37 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club: Burn 'em Bright!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote; BlackElk
Romney is by far our best bet in 2012

Are you freakin' serious?

He's a closet liberal. He's a gun-grabber who supports socialized healthcare. And those are only two of his flaws.

Romney and Paul are the two liberals in the field and Huntsman comes close.

40 posted on 09/20/2011 2:06:17 PM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson