Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Excerpted, please see link for entire expert analysis by Play-by-Play Genius, John Ziegler!

I actually learned something by reading this: Elections are won and lost by the numbers, and it looks like Obama has them.

What are we Conservatives and Patriots going to do to stop another Democrat win?

Our candidate better be REAL and not PUFF.

1 posted on 09/19/2011 3:16:12 PM PDT by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Joy Angela
The history of the electoral college is pretty awesome. It was to prevent people from winning by "blocks".

So Politics got smarter...They created the biggest blocks in the biggest states. The Dems additionally created huge blocks...like AARP and NOW....and they nurtured the union vote.

Finally, in the Repub Camp, the Tea Parties, and a lot of them, came to be...essentially doing the same thing.

The elections are beginnng to show the results of these groups. Congrats to the Tea Parties.

2 posted on 09/19/2011 3:22:25 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
When half the population is dependent upon Government force, at all levels, to derive their income, you KNOW the Progressive/Democrat/Socialist/Wealth-Redistributor is gonna win the elections.

Coupled with the Fraud of the Left, it is a real uphill struggle to take back this once-great Country.

3 posted on 09/19/2011 3:23:54 PM PDT by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela
It's going to be interesting hearing the arguments from "conservatives" who will base their arguments not on what is right or wrong, but what is most likely to get Obama defeated.

Those "conservatives" who think PA might go for the Republican might oppose this, not on Constitutional grounds, but in hopes of getting all of PA's votes.

Likewise "conservatives" who think PA is still going Democrat regardless might decide that "state's rights" trump the electoral system so that we can get at least some of PA's votes.

Such "pragmatic" thinking in the short run could come back to haunt us in the long run.

9 posted on 09/19/2011 3:58:30 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela

This is how I always thought it should be. I honestly feel like my vote doesn’t count at all in Presidential races. The dead people in Newark and Jersey City are the ones who decide on NJ Electoral votes.


12 posted on 09/19/2011 5:07:55 PM PDT by Free_SJersey (Celebrate Diversity------------ Divide and Conquer?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Joy Angela

The PA plan is a brilliant plan

It will contain vote fraud to a district by district basis, rendering urban vote fraud a pointless exercise. That will make elections more honest. This is more important than the tactical advantage of breaking up a blue state voting strength (we may win PA outright in 2012, but as Ziegler points out, the only way we win PA is if we actually dont need it and win OH, VA and other states.)

Zeigler also points out how breaking up the PA EVs will put Obama in a serious box in getting to 272 electoral votes.

Go for it!


15 posted on 09/19/2011 6:56:01 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: randita; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued; GOPsterinMA; Dengar01; ...

Pennsylvania is considering the Nebraska/Maine method of allocating electoral votes by Congressional district.


18 posted on 09/20/2011 4:12:01 AM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson