Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster
Under the concept of “structural change” why don't we prohibit lawyers from being elected to Congress?

Perhaps with a government dominated by businessmen (like it was prior to the 20th Century) we can not only reduce the cost of government but also reduce its size.

Businessmen know what it takes to make money both for themselves but for the rest of us too. And, they also know how to reduce personnel overhead to help them make money.

What would be like to live with an administration that reduces regulations and bureaucratic empires instead of living under an administration that increases regulations and bureaucratic empires?

9 posted on 09/19/2011 5:39:54 AM PDT by Nip (TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nip

Following up on your reply, Nip:

What have businesses been doing relentlessly at least for the past 25-30 years? Investing in technology for improved service and productivity; constantly downsizing (to improve service and improve profitability and productivity); emphasizing customer service (for improved profitability, sales and customer loyalty). The result is: businesses are sitting on lots of cash, have record levels of profitability, and are investing overseas for expansion purposes.

When is the last time any of these principles were pursued in the public sector? State or Federal? How about never?

What about our public institutions? Like our school system? Forget about it!


39 posted on 09/19/2011 11:54:59 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson