Well, that’s how guilt-by-association arguments go. We want to tear down Rick Perry, so we’ll accuse him falsely of actively supporting TARP based on a letter that says no such thing, while we ignore other candidates who actually said they supported TARP.
And if there’s some good people that have to be smeared int the process, we’ll do that. Take no prisoners, we have to burn the village down to clear the brush for some other candidate to come in and clean up the mess, even if people will accuse that candidate of the same thing, and already have.
In the historic context of that letter, it is as obvious as the nose on your face that it was in support of TARP.
Are you all going to trash your own credibility for the obviously completely unscrupulous Mr. Perry?
But Charles, you said last week that you were a Palin supporter? Which is it? Are you or aren't you?