Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2011 10:35:38 PM PDT by Borough Park
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Borough Park
As Perry Rises, G.O.P. Elite New York Times Looks Toward Romney
2 posted on 09/12/2011 10:40:32 PM PDT by preacher (A government which robs from Peter to pay Paul will always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

seems almost everyone here is more interested in attacking Perry than Romney.


3 posted on 09/12/2011 10:45:26 PM PDT by ari-freedom (It's time for Obama to get a downgrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

On a daily basis anymore, I hear the old Bush II hacks slamming and dinging Perry and propping up Mittens at every turn. That is all anyone needs to know about who the Elites are still putting their cash behind. Screw them.


4 posted on 09/12/2011 10:47:32 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park
I'm amazed that people who complain about "flip-flopping" can jump on the Perry bandwagon after he publishes a book that says one thing six months ago and then suddenly backpedals on many of those positions now.

At least Rick Perry wasn't enough of a hypocrite to go into the routine about whether government can force a person to buy a product or service. By executive order, he forced everyone in Texas who buys insurance to buy insurance that covers Gardasil vaccines. He's also forced everyone in Texas to buy in-state tuition for illegal aliens.

5 posted on 09/12/2011 10:47:45 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park
If he is the nominee, he will need to explain his position on Social Security better than he has so far.

I'm not convinced it is necessarily electoral poison, but if he doesn't better explain his objections to the program and his plans for fixing it, he will be demagogued to death over it.

9 posted on 09/12/2011 10:53:23 PM PDT by comebacknewt (I have to say Newt has been very good in the debates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

I’m not completely sold on Perry. But the opposition of the R establishment makes me more comfortable.


10 posted on 09/12/2011 10:53:32 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

Yea I am sooo impressed that Perry doesn’t want a border fence and has no problem giving illegals free services. Damn those GOP establishment figures who think that is wrong.


19 posted on 09/12/2011 11:23:38 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park
This is one of the stupidest articles I have read in a while. The headline claims “GOP elite” supports Romney over Perry then the article gives only the example of Pawlenty’s endorsement. The same Pawlenty who has already dropped out after an extremely weak campaign and a few weeks ago was talking about Obomneycare. Is Pawlenty supposed to be the entire “GOP elite”?

Who are these so called “GOP elite” anyway? The article doesn't identify them. It just names one low level Illinois politician. The point the article makes over and over again is that these so called “GOP elite” don't think Perry can appeal to “moderates and independents”.

The NYT is clearly trying to attack Perry and create internal divisions among Republicans. But the article is so poorly written and confused that it just makes the NYT look stupid. As usual.

23 posted on 09/12/2011 11:42:47 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park
particularly over his views of Social Security

His view is that it is structurally unsound and in need of reform to keep it from completely collapsing. Everyone else has the same view - including Romney, who said it was being run like a "criminal enterprise" vs. Perry who said it was being run like a "Ponzi scheme." Okay, they don't like Perry's terminology...say he just says something more generic like it is in "bad shape" - what does that change about the problems with the program? Absolutely nothing! The "controversy" over his comments are complete nonsense.

24 posted on 09/13/2011 12:11:49 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

There are plenty of “GOP Elite” looking towards Perry, too.


26 posted on 09/13/2011 1:42:36 AM PDT by stilloftyhenight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

I’m not sure what Romney was trying to accomplish in that debate last night. He seemed to fade into the background. Just appeared to be sitting back and letting things unfold. He’s well prepared, but he doesn’t generate much enthusiasm. I’ve been very skeptical of the idea that he might be in cahoots with Bachmann, but last night she appeared to be in kamikazi mode toward Perry. Still seems unlikely to me though.

Newt dominates these events rhetorically. Too bad he didn’t travel a different path in days gone by. No matter how well he does in the debates, nobody wants him as the nominee.

I’m a Perry supporter, but I haven’t been impressed with his performances in the two debates he’s been in. He was a little better this time, but he just strikes me as not being very verbally facile. And probably never will be.

Cain has improved a lot over the course of the campaign so far. His presentation of that 9-9-9 plan seems a bit gimmicky although the plan itself may be a good idea.

Santorum is good on the issues, but lacks even a trace of the charisma necessary to win the presidency.

Something about Huntsman irks me. I have a feeling he would irk me even if he were just reading names out of a phone book. Heck, he wouldn’t even have to say anything; he could irk me just by standing there.

I’ve seen Bachmann be very good in the past, but last night she just looked desperate.

Ron Paul remains Ron Paul.


27 posted on 09/13/2011 2:03:13 AM PDT by FreedomForce (Perry/Cain 2012 | Perry/Palin 2016 | Palin 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

The GOP Elite, MSM, RINO turds and all those Dems trying to push Romney up our rear ends can pound sand.
I will NOT vote for Mitt under any circumstances.
NO more RINOs. NOt now not ever.
REAL conservatives or go fish.


30 posted on 09/13/2011 3:24:33 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Obammy is little more than a quota boy with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

The Republican rank and file don’t want either one.
DEAL WITH IT!


31 posted on 09/13/2011 3:57:48 AM PDT by Flintlock (Photo ID for all voters--let our dead rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

Both Mittcare and Perry are unacceptable.


36 posted on 09/13/2011 5:05:41 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Borough Park

“As Perry Rises, G.O.P. Elite Look Toward Romney”

See...that’s the problem. The GOP “elite” don’t have their pulse on middle America, and they don’t respect middle America. In this respect, they are no different from the ‘rats.

Conversely, they are not respected in middle America at all. They seem to believe that they know what’s best for us, even though we don’t agree with them...because we don’t don’t have Ivy League degrees.

If they would let the people in middle America do their jobs without Big Brother watching over them, we would have been on the road to recovery a long time ago.

Frankly, an Ivy League degree to me is a disqualifier. We live in the real world, and we make this country work. Give me someone who has worked in the real world any day of the week, no matter where he/she went to school.

McCain...he was the last guy the Republican “elite” gave us.

How did that work out?

OT, but I would like to congratulate all FReepers in NY and NV!

Yippeee...y’all did it!


42 posted on 09/14/2011 12:00:12 AM PDT by dixiechick2000 (Proud barbarian TEA Party SOB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson