This is a very compelling point Dreher makes, and I have a hard time arguing with it.
I realize justice is imperfect and does need to be rendered as best we can, but there's also a side of me that wonders if our society has the moral authority to carry it out in its strongest terms. Objectively speaking, a justice system that can produce an OJ jury, a Clinton presidency or the legal idiocy surrounding the prosecution of U.S. military personnel in Iraq has no business even putting people in jail, let alone executing them.
They wouldn’t have gotten a conviction to be in question.