[Interesting Times]

Please. This doesn’t have anything to do with Fund. You’re cocked and primed to attack anybody who suggests that Palin might not be the next president, for whatever reason. If he’d written that Palin was likely to run and might very well win, would he still be an idiot? I don’t theenk so.

[onyx]

Three years ago DC pundits predicted with glee the demise of Sarah Palin's political career.

This past weekend their tune changed, citing false information that she has made a decision and set a date regarding a future campaign.

Any professional pundit claiming to have "inside information" regarding Governor Palin's personal decision is not only wrong but their comments are specifically intended to mislead the American public.

These are the same tired establishment political games that fuel the 24 hour news cycle and that all Americans will hopefully reject in 2012, and this is more of the "politics-as-usual" that Sarah Palin has fought against throughout her career.

[agere_contra]

If he’d written that Palin was likely to run and might very well win, would he still be an idiot?

If he'd said it based on a misquote and somebody else's T-shirt, then yes. He would still be an idiot.

[rintense]

Yes he would because he is writing from the perspective that he has some ‘inside’ knowledge, very much the same as Rove did. Fund’s opinion isn’t any different from here on FR *except* he’s using his MSM position to opine.