To: Las Vegas Ron; what's up; Jim Robinson
"What's up", like the author of this article is misconstruing her words and the interview. If you hear the interview, it was Greta that said it would be seen as a "victory". Palin very clearly said it was a victory only in that the TEA party changed the debate and nothing more. She also dissed some of the details saying she was disgusted (my word) with us giving Obama more to spend, etc.
"What's up", you are being disingenuous here, I cut you some slack last night, and now you come on with the same slander.
25 posted on
08/02/2011 2:38:31 PM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark; what's up; Jim Robinson
Palin very clearly said it was a victory only in that the TEA party changed the debate and nothing more. Thanks for clearing that up, I agree with that as evidenced by my previous post.
What I don't understand is the deliberate attempts to bash Palin here. While I do not share the enthusiasm that many do here for her I am certainly not a detractor nor would I deliberately bash her (as many here seem bent on doing). In fact, I have defended her several time here from unfair and misguided attacks.
We have a Country to save, we best get with it and do it or else it is all moot and for naught.
Bashing and eating our own simply serve no purpose.
41 posted on
08/02/2011 2:48:49 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: Lakeshark
Palin also said the bill was a step in the right direction
She used the word "victory" also in the context of the actions Congress took (although she was displeased by aspects of it so not 100% victory), and not just the Tea Party.
You seem to be the one being disingenuous.
57 posted on
08/02/2011 3:02:13 PM PDT by
Justice
To: Lakeshark; what's up; mulligan; Las Vegas Ron
Palin's statement is
here and she does qualify it. She was responding to what
Greta said a few seconds earlier.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson