Posted on 07/23/2011 12:11:38 PM PDT by opentalk
While the leftist and Islamic supremacist ghouls rush to portray Norway mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik as a Christian and even as an anti-jihadist, the unanswered questions multiply. Why did a jihad group take credit for the atrocities, and then retract? And who altered the murderer's Facebook page? Yesterday, at the time that his name was released, his Facebook page looked like this (hat tip Vivien for the screenshot):
But shortly thereafter, this screenshot started circulating, of an altered Facebook page on which Breivik identified himself as a Christian and a conservative: (screenshot hat tip Vivien)
Did he have two different Facebook pages, one in Norwegian and one in English, and he only identified himself as a Christian and a conservative on the English one? Or did he pause from his murder spree to add "Christian" and "conservative" to his Facebook profile? Or maybe the whole page is a fake, as has been reported here.
But in the case, who faked it, and why? Who is so anxious to portray Breivik as a Christian and conservative? And if this was faked, can we trust any of the material that is now being released about Breivik being anti-jihad?
Was this compendium distributed in any way other being online? Why would someone who hated the onslaught of Islam act in the exact same manner as jihadis - slaughtering the innocent?
Yeah, and he let them take him alive, while he wails over and over about going down shooting in his screed.
He must be wanting to have his day in court to explain himself, or something. The document, though over the top, is fairly cogent from what I have read so far. The guy is crazy, but he is also pretty smart and has spent a lot of time planning his Doomsday scenario out.
Terrifying.
I wasn’t on Fakebook yesterday at all, so it couldn’t have been me, I swear! Search me, I was looking at porn all day.
In just about everyone of those pictures you can see the photoshop traces of where his head was cutout and pasted on different bodies. It’s so fake.
In just about everyone of those pictures you can see the photoshop traces of where his head was cutout and pasted on different bodies. It’s so fake.
You have mail
Did you read the thing?
You nailed it, little jeremiah.
It smells just like a set-up.
Whoa.
But how does killing 100 innocent kids even fit into this plan?
What constitutes innocence to a madman? To him, they carried the sins of the fathers.
Really.
It is so inconceivable. I can certainly understand his outrage against leftism, multiculturalism, pro-Muslimism etc. But to slaughter unarmed young people like a machine? What kind of vicious fiend would do that?
Even in the book Babi Yar, the German soldiers had to get drunk to kill the innocent Jews.
This is just beyond mind boggling.
Good observation.
I might be wrong but he could not have been a member of the Knight’s Templar and a Mason.
And so i have it, in order to refute them. And being educated in something, or finding value therein does not mean that same as being one. In his interview with The New York Times, Stanley Kubrick stated that his view of mankind’s innate capacity for violence and terror was closer to those of Christianity than to humanism or Jewish theology, saying, “I mean, it’s essentially Christian theology anyway, that view of man.”
Yes, and how dare the media and anyone else portray him as such...set up!
All you have to do is read his own writing http://www.kevinislaughter.com/wp-content/uploads/2083+-+A+European+Declaration+of+Independence.pdf
and watch his video.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAwp2FnRmsE&feature=player_detailpage&skipcontrinter=1
He hated the fact that so many Muslims, especially Somalis and Pakistanis, were emigrating to Norway. It’s a real problem, since Norway is such a small country. Breivik most of all hated the political party that promoted this emigration. So he killed as many of their children as he could.
A monster, simply a monster. Think of all the grieving parents .... how is this going to advance his cause?
“They definitely take their vacations seriously.” Well, that’s ONE Scandinavian trait I wouldn’t mind us copying.
1.) They weren’t kids. They were between the ages of 16 and
2.) He saw them as the enemy. They were the children of the Labor Party, Liberals that had sold out their bloodline and religion by letting so many Muslims emigrate into Norway.
3.) It was a training camp, essentially, for young adults who wanted to become active in the Labor Party.
4.) It was held on a very small island. He set off the bomb in Oslo as a distraction, so the police would all be far away while he shot up the camp. He methodically hunted and shot every person he could - that’s why so many of them dove into the water. They were trying to escape him. There was nowhere to go,; that’s why he could kill so many. It was monstrous - imagine being a kid on that island, hearing him coming for you.
5.) Why kids? What better way to decimate all those families, all those adults? H was punishing the parents as well as the children. There are probably families in Norway tonight who lost 2 or more children. My friend is a teacher in Trondheim; she has probably lost students.
The more you think about it, the more horrible it becomes. It makes me wonder if the language all Americans use about “hatred” of people we don’t agree with politically is encouraging another monster like this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.