Mary Ellen Harte is coauthor of "Cool the Earth, Save the Economy." Anne Ehrlich is a senior research scientist at Stanford University. John Harte and Paul Ehrlich contributed to this piece. All are biologists involved in the study of climate change and sustainability.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
She sounds like a racist misanthrope.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
“Our unsustainable population levels are depleting resources and denying a decent future to our descendants.”
Ahh the irony
3 posted on
07/21/2011 12:15:37 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Almost all children are unplanned, the only difference is 50 years ago people would get married then have their little accident (knowing they wanted a family, just weren’t exactly planning for it or thouht they were done having children) Today people hook up, get knocked up and live off the dole.
4 posted on
07/21/2011 12:15:56 AM PDT by
LukeL
(Barack Obama: Jimmy Carter 2 Electric Boogaloo)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Our unsustainable population levels are depleting resources and denying a decent future to our descendants.So kill yourself. Talk as many of your friends into it as well.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gosh darn it! She’s right!
Here’s an idea. Let’s nuke Los Angeles. Put the warhead right on the LA Times building. That will remove a few grubby human parasites.
7 posted on
07/21/2011 12:20:15 AM PDT by
Ronin
(Obamanation has replaced Bizarroworld as the most twisted place in the universe.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
But I thought the US had a shortage of people? Isn’t that the argument I hear about immigration? We need more people?
Plus more people = more folks to tax!
I love it when liberal worlds collide.
8 posted on
07/21/2011 12:21:56 AM PDT by
esoxmagnum
(The rats have been trained to pull the D voting lever to get their little food pellet)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Strange how all these ‘overpopulationists’ have no desire to reduce their own personal impact on the planet. I’m sure that they have the cash for a Dignatis ‘clinic’. Why don’t they walk the walk? Gee...I wonder.
Imagine all the trees and power that could be saved with less of them in the world.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Leave it to those damn academic elitists....from the left.
Give it a week or two and she will be advocating that the US should be giving all women free birth control pills.....like they are advocating here in the US. =.=
10 posted on
07/21/2011 12:24:36 AM PDT by
cranked
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The only solutions were put forth by Obama’s science advisor John Holdren when he was at Berkeley.
We need birth control in the water supply.
12 posted on
07/21/2011 12:24:58 AM PDT by
Winstons Julia
(when liberals rant, it's called free speech; when conservatives vent, it's called hate speech.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The author should follow her mantra and kill herself already.
13 posted on
07/21/2011 12:25:45 AM PDT by
antceecee
(Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
>>that half yes, half of all U.S. pregnancies are unintended. <<
They should probably tell people what causes pregnancy.
I suggest the Quarter Solution. Women should put a quarter between their knees when they are feeling aflushed. It is a 100% prophylactic against unintended pregnancy.
14 posted on
07/21/2011 12:26:44 AM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Herman Cain 2012)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Any time you hear someone say that "there are too many people", you may be sure that they mean "there are too many other people".
15 posted on
07/21/2011 12:32:24 AM PDT by
ExGeeEye
(Freedom is saying "No!" to the Feds, and getting away with it. "Speak 'NO' to Power!")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Mary Ellen Harte is coauthor of "Cool the Earth, Save the Economy." Anne Ehrlich is a senior research scientist at Stanford University. John Harte and Paul Ehrlich contributed to this piece. All are biologists involved in the study of climate change and sustainability.
Missing barf alert.
20 posted on
07/21/2011 12:41:27 AM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If all the leftist and liberals just died to save the earth, we would have a lot less people and problems..After all, its for the children.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
23 posted on
07/21/2011 12:44:59 AM PDT by
Gondring
(Going D'Anconia)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Too many of the wrong people. LOL!
(sometimes i kill myself)
24 posted on
07/21/2011 12:48:04 AM PDT by
Berlin_Freeper
("Don't Call My Bluff")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Civic and living standards make more difference in quality of life than sheer population.
25 posted on
07/21/2011 12:49:46 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
P.J. O’Rourke deconstructed the liberal “over population” line years ago. They use Calcutta India, or Dacca Bangladesh as examples of too many people, but seem perfectly happy at crowded cocktail parties with other likeminded liberals, ergo they only want to limit the earth of people unlike themselves.
27 posted on
07/21/2011 12:51:19 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Vote for leaders who vigorously promote those humane solutions. And demand that media start educating the public every day on the role played by the unsustainable human numbers behind environmental degradation and human calamities and start covering the solutions. The public needs a constant message: "It's time to stop growing and become sustainable."
A propaganda piece that fails to deal with actual demographics, which is declining. The world population is more likely to decrease in the next twenty years, due to the failure to reproduce, abortion and "birth control".
The media have been promoting this idea for decades. The do not need to increase their propaganda. What is needed is some facts, that most of the demographics of the world are below replacement level. That it is impossible with an inverted population pyramid to sustain care for the elderly and there can be no real economic growth without population growth.
We have had periods where the human population stayed the same or decreased, the black death in the middle ages and the Spanish flu after WWI are examples.
For some, out of religious belief, (not just Islam), children are viewed as a blessing, barrenness an affliction, and "blessed is the man that has his quiver full of them."
When the writer's god, the government, cannot take care of them, puts them in a nursing home or plans to eliminate them, and there is no one to visit them, they will be the most pathetic of the elderly in the world.
29 posted on
07/21/2011 12:56:41 AM PDT by
verklaring
(Pyrite is not gold))
To: Oldeconomybuyer
That's a lot of unintended consumers adding to our future climate change.I had to stop reading right there.
Adding condescension to ignorance makes for a very unpromising discussion.
Nothing sabotages interest in a meaningful discussion as assumed agreement on a critical part of a discussion, where none exists or can possibly exist.
Climate change has always been with us, will always be with us and the population is irrelevant. The fittest will survive and the useless will die. Nature has neither heart nor conscience.
30 posted on
07/21/2011 1:00:19 AM PDT by
Publius6961
(My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson