Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is an Eclipse Described in the Odyssey (and does it date the return of Odysseus to Penelope)
Proceedings of the National Academy of Science June 2008 ^ | June 2008 | Marcelo Magnasco

Posted on 07/08/2011 11:33:43 AM PDT by wildbill

“Now when did Odysseus return to Penelope? The date is given with a precision most unusual in epic poetry.”

"Because the lines describing the alleged eclipse are considered suspect, we shall use other passages in the Odyssey to shed some light on the issue, without assuming an eclipse. Given an interpretation of certain passages in the Odyssey as describing astronomical phenomena, we will look for dates in which the phenomena match. We shall find that the most likely day matching these other phenomena is 16 April 1178 B.C., suggesting there may be corroborating information in the epic for the eclipse hypothesis. In other words, the passages we analyze appear to cohere.

Two important caveats: first, that if our interpretation of such passages as astronomical phenomena were incorrect, our calculation of dates and their probability or improbability would also be incorrect; and second, that even if correct, we get no indication whether the events narrated in the epic did happen.

(Excerpt) Read more at pnas.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: archaeoastronomy; catastrophism; eclipse; godsgravesglyphs; odysseus; odyssey; trojanwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Joe 6-pack

I’m not talking about being able to recognize isolated skeletal parts. Only a real woodsman, or a person who kills his own food, could probably tell the difference between the isolated pelvis of different game species that are about the same size.

But when anybody encounters and entire skeleton, it’s pretty clear whether it’s a cow, a deer, a human being, a dog, a small rodent-like mammal, an elephant, or something you’ve never seen before. You can certainly look at a whole skeleton and recognize the shape of a horse’s skull and neck, even if you’re not a horseman, so you know you haven’t found the skeleton of a deer or muskrat. Naturally if some primitive person, or even a modern-day person, came across the newly-exposed skeleton of a Tyrannosaurus Rex, they could see that this huge thing was like nothing that had been seen before, and it doesn’t take much to flesh the bones out in one’s mind.


41 posted on 07/09/2011 12:06:17 PM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


42 posted on 03/01/2013 6:23:10 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

One of *those* topics.



43 posted on 08/11/2021 9:45:56 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson