There's no need for the wink emoticon -- a lot of warmists actually want to do something similar.
More here:
http://www.wired.com/science/planetearth/magazine/16-07/ff_geoengineering?currentPage=2
Posted on 07/05/2011 11:25:26 AM PDT by kiryandil
A new study published this week offering a fresh take on what may have driven a temporary, 10-year slowdown in global warming reinforces the scientific hypothesis that human activities are contributing to long-term global warming... **snip**
...But the new study, by American and Finnish researchers, says the answer lies mainly in the quickening pace of coal consumption in Asia, particularly in China, and the air pollution that is causing... **snip**
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Yeah ... but its still Bushes fault.
No shi’ite! I know they want it both ways in terms of weather as an indicator of climate change, but come on! I don’t know what’s more sad; that they present this BS as serious science or that people actually believe them.
Ping.
The sun is doing a good job at handling global warming, like it has always done. I keep wondering how much Carbon gas these wildfires are putting into the atmosphere, and wondering if we can expect sudden, rapid, violent, irreversible, catastrophic climate change within the next few days. If not, why not? This has to be equal to years of Americans enjoying energy.
Is that “lull” the one those of us who know how to interpret data have been pointing at for the last few years...the same “lull” that global warming experts pooh-poohed?
Or is this a different “lull”.
Gads, I’ve had fun with my lib friends (none of which have the slightest clue about anything associated with metrology - not meterology...look it up, libtards, the physics of EM absorption, Boltzman curves, etc)...watching their “gurus” make total Obamas out of themselves.
Definition: Make a total Obama of one’s self - (phrase) To demonstrate that one has literally no education or logical background in any subject they purport to “know), resulting in them being judged as complete cretins qualified only for high political office.
You took the words right out of my fingers!
“Blames,” huh? That choice of words is very telling. It shows that the author WANTS global warming, probably because it is an excuse to implement socialism. Ergo, no global warming is a problem, and he needs something on which to “blame” that problem...
Everything in God's creation is temporary; only the time scales vary.
MAY HAVE (as in: "might" have, etc., etc.) is the operative term there.
It is NOT "EVIDENCE", it is A theory.
Okay, somebody needs to get their story straight, and they need to get the memo out to everybody so they’re on the same page with their talking points!
I share your confusion. Over the weekend, one of the cable channels ran a marathon of “The Twilight Zone.” I somehow missed the one on global warming.
Scientists cause mass lying and fraud on a global scale.
LLS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.