43 Idiots and RINOs.
Plus the hoards of “HUR HUR HUR SHE WONKT RUN CUZ SHE KAINT WIN” types here on FR.
I didn’t see that jackass Neil Boortz’s name on the list.
Now if Palin doesn’t run (a good bet) ... I am sure Ian will post an article admitting he was a shmuck. Yeah, right.
where is ziggy ziegler.
I mentioned on another thread that FR should have a letter of apology posted by either the PDSers or the Palin supporters. I’ll gladly eat crow if I’m wrong.
How about it Palin naysayers? Willing to pony up your rep on this issue?
I don’t know how anyone can watch and listen to this speech, one of all time favorites, and still think this woman isn’t already running for President.
http://www.therightscoop.com/live-watch-sarah-palin-at-wisconsin-tea-party/
Franklin Graham isn’t a pundit.
He’s a Christian minister that gave his honest opinion.
This article is senseless. Those pundits who predict that Sarah will not run will have no more egg on their face if she does run than those pundits who predict that she will run will have if she does not run. In either case it would be a simple matter of getting a prediction wrong. Such an occasion is hardly ruinous for a pundit’s career. The bigger problem is getting a large proportion of their predictions wring.
I agree with this entirely.
I would add, however, that there are plenty here at FR who are going to have some explaining to do if she doesn’t.
One group is going to be very, very, very wrong. And the fascinating things is that both camps are completely 100% utterly convinced that they know the truth of the matter.
One of them will be wrong.
As for me...I tend to think as of today, that she won’t run. Last week, when it was reported that she was meeting with Iowa leaders while in the state for the premier, I thought for sure that she was. However, about Wednesday or Thursday she shot that down, and all those that she would have contacted said that they had not heard from her and didn’t know anyone who had heard from her. Then there was that weird story about that grassroots organizer who has been working for nine months in Iowa organizing for her, but as it turns out, he is completely independent of her and has never even met her. This is a very strange phenomenon and if she were to run, she will have a huge amount of grassroots intensity behind her, spontaneously.
But at some point, she also has to explicitly seek the office.
And...at this moment, I don’t see current evidence of that. Maybe this week will bring different news on that front. Personally, I hope so. She needs to run.
Add Dana Perino.
The title says it all......IF/WHEN.....you are being played.
Yepper, the race for the nomination is already settles....NOT
IF SHE RUNS ???? LOL, That's real confidence.
IMHO...
I try to remember it’s about America being in a bind and getting out of it, not any particular candidate.
There is no guarantee that a Repub will beat the big fat zero, even though it seems very likely that any reasonably conservative, non-RINO candidate would.
I’ve given up watching candidates like I’m reading the hollywood gossip rags; who’s saying this, who’s doing that.
This way, I can be always positive about every conservative with anyone I talk to.
The House and Senate are more important that the President, since a libby Congress can tie up a President rather thoroughly. And then conservatives will simply have egg on their face for the “conservative President that didn’t get anything done”.
I would not wish that on ANY conservative President - and certainly not on America.
Interesting. I hope Mrs. Palin runs, since she has the potential to decrease the corruption in Federal politics: a ton of potential.
If she runs, I’m behind her 100%.
I don’t have to explain anything to anyone.
No Michele Bachmann or Ed Rollins listed?
You folks need to get some perspective and sanity quickly or you'll kill a Palin campaign faster than anything going.