Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Perry vs. TSA
The Washington Times ^ | 06/14/2011 | The Washington Times

Posted on 06/14/2011 2:20:13 PM PDT by jbwilson

It’s now up to Texas Gov. Rick Perry to rescue the nation’s travelers from the indignity of x-rated airport screening at the hands of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). On Tuesday, a state House of Representatives committee is scheduled to consider revised legislation holding blue-gloved bureaucrats criminally liable for grabbing the private parts of passengers without probable cause or consent. For the measure to proceed further, however, Mr. Perry would have to formally add it to the list of bills considered during the special session now under way.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; fourthamendment; rickperry; tsa; tsapervs
Now it's not just Texas watching to see what Governor Perry does with the TSA bill.

What's it going to be, Governor? Are you going to add the TSA anti-groping bill (and preferably also the campus carry bill) to the special session, or are you going to wimp out and start trying to market yourself as a centrist?
1 posted on 06/14/2011 2:20:21 PM PDT by jbwilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jbwilson

It’s a compromise at best — Perry has no problem with the X ray rooms.


2 posted on 06/14/2011 2:23:54 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Most people don’t, but the problem with them is that TSA won’t tell people the dosage they’ll be receiving, which is a problem for cancer patients like my mom.

After that bill, one should be proposed that requires the TSA equipment be subject to regular inspection and dosage measurement by Texas health authorities with random spot checks.


3 posted on 06/14/2011 2:32:48 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jbwilson

If Perry pushes the anti-groping legislation through and then signs it into law in Texas, he’ll be our next President.

If he doesn’t, he’ll just be another governor who is intimidated by Obama and his mob.


4 posted on 06/14/2011 2:36:12 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbwilson
Other than checking for explosives, the mindset of the air-traveler has forever been changed. Prior to 9/11, we told to co-operate with terrorist, and we would be freed. Now, we KNOW that the terrorists will kill us whether we co-operate or not ... so, the mindset of the air-traveler is to kill the terrorist (if possible), but at the very least beat and subdue them.

And how many times have passengers tackled and beaten someone who did something untoward on a flight? Simply stated, hijackers cannot hold off 200 angry passengers. So, the job of the TSA is simply to remove the bombs. Disarming the passengers is both pointless, and counter-productive.

5 posted on 06/14/2011 2:39:09 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbwilson

Wait a few minutes and the Perry bashers will appear....still harping about nonsense that if they had a brain would certainly merit consideration on its merits. No they prefer to be one issue idiots... analogous to fools on the left with their venom and foolishness.... Note to the rest of America...Perry is the real deal and has been a heckuva Governor for Texas... Only the uninformed and fools bash him... This comes from a Texan....


6 posted on 06/14/2011 3:27:08 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
Most people don't have a problem with the x-ray scanners because they have pretty much given in to Uncle Sugars decades long nit picking away at our liberties by over lawing and over regulating.

Folks don't remember what true freedom and personal responsibility is.

7 posted on 06/14/2011 3:37:40 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jbwilson
For what it's worth, the committee met and approved the legislation.

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOTICE OF FORMAL MEETING

COMMITTEE: Criminal Jurisprudence

TIME & DATE: Upon final adjourn./recess
Tuesday, June 14, 2011

PLACE: House Chamber, Desk #92
CHAIR: Rep. Pete Gallego

 

HB 41 Simpson | et al.
Relating to prosecution and punishment for the offense of official oppression by the intrusive touching of persons seeking access to public buildings and transportation; providing penalties.

HB 75 Harper-Brown
Relating to the punishment for the offense of indecent exposure.

 

Notice of this meeting was announced from the house floor.

 

 

 

CLICK




The House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

82nd Legislature

June 14, 2011

Upon final adjourn./recess

House Chamber, Desk #92

 

Pursuant to an announcement from the House floor on June 14, 2011, the House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence met in a formal meeting and was called to order by the chair, Representative Gallego, at 2:32 p.m.

 

The initial quorum call was answered as follows: Representatives Gallego; Burkett; Carter; Rodriguez, Eddie; and Zedler.

 

A quorum was present.

 

HB 41

 

The chair laid out HB 41.

 

Representative Zedler moved that HB 41, without amendments, be reported favorably to the full house with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed. The motion prevailed by the following record vote:

 

Ayes: Representatives Gallego; Burkett; Carter; Rodriguez, Eddie; Zedler (5).

 

Nays: None (0).

 

Present, Not Voting: None (0).

 

Absent: Representatives Hartnett; Aliseda; Christian; Davis, Yvonne (4).

 

HB 75

 

The chair laid out HB 75.

 

Representative Burkett moved that HB 75, without amendments, be reported favorably to the full house with the recommendation that it do pass and be printed. The motion prevailed by the following record vote:

 

Ayes: Representatives Gallego; Burkett; Carter; Rodriguez, Eddie; Zedler (5).

 

Nays: None (0).

 

Present, Not Voting: None (0).

 

Absent: Representatives Hartnett; Aliseda; Christian; Davis, Yvonne (4).

 

At 2:34 p.m., on the motion of the chair and without objection, the meeting was adjourned subject to the call of the chair.

 

 

________________________________________________

Rep. Gallego, Chair

 

 

________________________________________________

Michael Pacheco, Clerk

 

 

ClICK

8 posted on 06/14/2011 3:42:18 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

I wnder if the tsa agents peek under the burkas to see if the individual shaved that day. And how about those arabs wearing those wound towels on their heads and long whie dresses. Do the tsa agents look under then and feel around?


9 posted on 06/14/2011 3:42:47 PM PDT by tillacum (The whining, gasfumed, presstitutes are following Sarah's bus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

One step at a time - things didn’t get this bad overnight, they progressed in steps and it will only be reversed the same way.


10 posted on 06/14/2011 5:55:39 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jbwilson

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/07/legislature/4535418.html
Perry’s vaccination order still stoking fires

AUSTIN — Blowback continued at the Capitol on Wednesday over Gov. Rick Perry’s order mandating
that schoolgirls be vaccinated against a sexually transmitted disease linked to cervical cancer.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/special/07/legislature/4528909.html

Critics rip Perry’s vaccine mandate
Governor rejects opponents’ calls to reverse order

AUSTIN — Gov. Rick Perry stood firm Monday against a political firestorm generated by his
order that sixth-grade girls be inoculated against a sexually transmitted virus linked to cervical cancer.

Social conservatives from Texas to Washington called on Perry to reverse his order making
Texas the first state to require the vaccine, saying the mandate makes sex seem permissible
and that parents should be the ones to decide whether to immunize their daughters.
And several Texas lawmakers expressed outrage at Perry for circumventing the legislative process.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/26/us/26texas.html

The vaccine, Gardasil, is manufactured by Merck, which was represented in Austin by the
lobbyist Mike Toomey, who was chief of staff for Mr. Perry from 2002 to 2004.


11 posted on 06/21/2011 4:53:32 PM PDT by truthfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson