Posted on 06/11/2011 4:38:26 AM PDT by Clive
Only the politically correct, and they are the majority in the contemporary West, remain surprised of how quickly the so-called Arab spring has turned into an Arab frenzy and is headed into an Arab inferno.
In the long run, everything can likely work out and Arabs hopefully may learn to distinguish between mobocracy, as a tyranny of the majority, and democracy, as a rule of law, in which minorities are protected as equal members of society.
But in the long run, as Lord John Maynard Keynes the revered economic guru of the liberal-left pointed out the obvious: In the long run we are all dead. What matters is whether in the short or medium term Arab politics can break out of its closed circle of traditional consensus that frowns upon innovation as heresy.
The problem is culture. Arab culture, despite tremendous changes that have occurred elsewhere in the world, remains resilient in adhering to traditional values of patriarchy and the tribal order of father (leader) knows what is best for his tribe or nation.
The Arab League consists of 21 states and the Palestinian Authority. There is not one single democracy in this collection of Arab states, and the predominant reason for the absence of democracy among Arabs is culture.
Democracy is not merely an election, and a representative party with majority support holding power.
For democracy to work, the prerequisite is a culture in which the people recognizes the other irrespective of how the other is defined in terms of ethnicity or religion or gender as equal, and their interests and aspirations as legitimate.
This recognition of the other is missing in Arab culture. The other is merely tolerated in a subordinate status and since the other in the modern context is unwilling to be consigned indefinitely into an inferior position, the result is the repeated cycle of rebellion and repression in Arab history.
One of the most insightful explorations of the reasons for the absence of democracy in the Arab world is provided by an Arab-Moroccan woman, Fatima Mernissi.
Mernissis book Islam and Democracy: Fear of the Modern World (1992) is remarkable for the wealth of ideas she presents in explaining the anti-democratic culture of her people, and the fear of modernity that grips them.
The ultimate other, and also the ultimate minority, is the individual asserting his/her individuality against the collective order of men and things. In Arab culture, individualism as cultivated in the West is feared and repressed because its affirmation represents the freedom of an individual contesting with and moving out of the closed circle of the tribe.
The West (gharb in Arabic), as Mernissi explains, is frightening because, among many things, freedom renders it strange, and like the female form, freedom is seductive.
Arab culture, on the contrary, demands whatever is desirable and relished in private must be hidden (veiled) in public. The fear of fitna or anarchy haunts Arab culture.
In our time, Mernissi writes, freedom in the Arab world is synonymous with disorder. And so a culture suspicious of the West will continue to prefer arid summers of tribal order over any spring that heralds freedom for its people.
I erred, I said the Arab culture can IMPLODE, I wish it would, what really happens that it EXPLODES outward, hurting others. If it would all just implode that would be great.
Thank you, the 3 of you for your posts. These make for good reading and are exemplary for FR as a place for the erudite to put forth their points.
well said. too many are willfully ignorant
Islam is the appendix of history, a useless appendage
it can easily still take your life if not excised from
the body politic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.