THEY REALLY tried to get this Professor to say Sarah messed up....and she did NOT!
I don’t think he was lamenting the fact that Palin was giving a history on Revere.
“and this is their system before Facebook, before Twitter,
before NPR”
Prof. ALLISON: I wish it didn’t take Sarah Palin coming to town to bring us together.
He just had enought integrity to not shame himself on the radio. Doubt he feels the same in the company of his fellow faculty.
If the professor lived in Boston and knew history he just might have credibility on the issue. /s
“Prof. ALLISON: Yeah. She was making a Second Amendment case. “
especially with that United Nations plan recently in the News, to impose global gun control,
U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2731305/posts
and the fact that Palin is a lot smarter than some people think...
...I wish more people would actually look at what Palin actually said. i dont think Sarah Palin was trying to do a gotcha on the Media about Paul Revere, as even i first thought.
she seems to be trying to use it, as a lesson about 2nd Amendment. look how many times she uses the word arms.
...her ENTIRE emphasis, was about the rebels being able to DEFEND their liberty from the British,
BECAUSE they had arms.
= = =
Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there that
hey, youre not going to take American arms,
you are not going to beat our own well-armed persons
individual private militia that we have.
He who warned the British that they
werent going to be taking away our arms
by ringing those bells and by making sure that as hes riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free
and we were going to be armed.
If they have a problem with what the tour guide told her, they should take it up with the tour guide. Who thinks a tour guide is giving out incorrect information? Anyway, from what I’ve read from Paul Revere, she got the gist of it right.