Clinton's "Pain" May Now Be Obama's; RE:Ol'Man Judge Lamberth

WorldNetDaily ^ | 6/4/11 | myself

[urtax$@work]

This was then:

Federal Judge Royce Lamberth is best known for the ease with which he approved dozens of discovery motions that allowed fellow conservative Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch to dig into the public and private life of President Bill Clinton.(Brief Article)

(Publication: The Washington Monthly Publish date: October 1, 2001 Author: GLASTRIS, PAUL Copyright)

This is now:

U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery and she can issue subpoenas to those holding the documentation she is seeking.

Read more: Obama critic coming closer to Social Security records? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=306873#ixzz1OJ9xgnpy

[freepersup]

I’m not missing the fact that Obama is gaming the SS admin. Geesh. I’ve been here since 1998... (Going on 14 years) I’ve read much of the investigative reports on Obama and his obfuscations. Riddle me this: Why DOES Obama use a DEAD persons SS #?

[freepersup]

The SS admin. stopped using geo designations some time ago. You’re trying to make a point right? What is it?

[SatinDoll]

Well, that’s an excellent question. Why does a person use a fake SSN, and in Obama’s case, have so many.

Because he is a con artist who commits fraud.

[CanaGuy]

That is correct iah. Well, speaking in my case, anyway, the SSS# on my 1966-issued “Draft Card” was divided into 4 clusters and the 3rd cluster did contain the last two digits of my birth year. Seems unlikely that it was a coincidence.

[EDINVA]

I question that there will actually be any discovery in this case any time soon. Call me a spoil sport or after birther, whatever .. but the 2 Orders Judge Lamberth issued merely a) let Dr Taitz refile her complaint with redacted SS#s within 14 days, and b) invite the SS Director to file a dispositive motion within 30 days. .

The judge’s “Scheduling Order” does not set out a time frame for discovery as is typically contained within the Scheduling Order of a case that is moving forward. Dr Taitz can subpoena, call for depositions, or send out written discovery all she wants, but they would be objected to (successfully, I’d venture) until such time as the defendant’s dispositive motion, her opposition, and his reply are ruled on. That’s a good 2+ months out.

This endless misinterpreting of judges’ orders and misreporting on them has gotten on my last nerve.

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

I can wait....not a problem.

[EDINVA]

“I can wait....”

That’s not the point. The Orders and Dr. Taitz’s interpretation of them, and the subsequent reporting of her claims, are 180 degrees apart. How often are ‘birthers’ going to keep falling for misleading information? This is really inexcusable.

No one knows for sure how the dispositive motion will be decided. If it favors the SS Director, there will be no discovery conducted, and if I were a betting man, that’s where my money would go. Note that the Director wasn’t invited to file an Answer to the refiled Complaint; he was invited to file a dispositive motion. What do you think that means?

If you’re not familiar with “Scheduling Orders,” they typically set out a period of discovery, written, depositions, etc. Following the close of the discovery period there is another period for the filing of dispositive motions. Funny, but I missed that whole discovery part in Judge Lamberth’s “Scheduling Order.”

Your wait may be a lot longer than you think. Now, Judge Lamberth could allow the case and discovery to proceed, but I wouldn’t bet the farm on it.

[American Constitutionalist]

" U.S. District Court Chief Judge Royce Lamberth this week rejected a defense concern over procedure in the dispute, and Taitz told WND today the case has moved into discovery "

But, we have been told over and over and over again like a broken piano by the obotcyborgs that this issue and case was not going anywhere and there will never be any kind of " discovery " ....

[American Constitutionalist]

Obotcyborgs get paid good money from the slush fund / 2012 campaign money ill gotten from over seas donations.

[El Sordo]

Sure. I can only wish Orly that would engage in sane actions.

Maybe even interpret a regulation properly or at least file something correctly by the third try.

[nikos1121]

I say BS to that. My SS starts with 347. What does that mean? How about yours?

[nikos1121]

You might be right for those SS numbers issued within the last few years, but for those of us over the age of 40 it is clearly based on your geographical location.

This comes from their website:

The chart below shows the first 3 digits of the social security numbers assigned throughout the United States and its possessions. See “Note” at bottom of page.

001-003 New Hampshire 261-267 Florida 449-467 Texas 531-539 Washington
004-007 Maine 589-595 627-645 540-544 Oregon
008-009 Vermont 766-772 468-477 Minnesota 545-573 California
010-034 Massachusetts 268-302 Ohio 478-485 Iowa 602-626
035-039 Rhode Island 303-317 Indiana 486-500 Missouri 574 Alaska
040-049 Connecticut 318-361 Illinois 501-502 North Dakota 575-576 Hawaii
050-134 New York 362-386 Michigan 503-504 South Dakota 750-751
135-158 New Jersey 387-399 Wisconsin 505-508 Nebraska 577-579 District of Columbia
159-211 Pennsylvania 400-407 Kentucky 509-515 Kansas 580 Virgin Islands
212-220 Maryland 408-415 Tennessee 516-517 Montana 580-584 Puerto Rico
221-222 Delaware 756-763 518-519 Idaho 596-599
223-231 Virginia 416-424 Alabama 520 Wyoming 586 Guam
691-699 425-428 Mississippi 521-524 Colorado 586 American Samoa
232-236 West Virginia 587-588 650-653 586 Philippine Islands
232 North Carolina 752-755 525,585 New Mexico 700-728 Railroad Board**
237-246 429-432 Arkansas 648-649 729-733 Enumeration at Entry
681-690 676-679 526-527 Arizona
247-251 South Carolina 433-439 Louisiana 600-601
654-658 659-665 764-765
252-260 Georgia 440-448 Oklahoma 528-529 Utah
667-675 530,680 Nevada 646-647

NOTE: The same area, when shown more than once, means that certain numbers have been transferred from one State to another, or that an area has been divided for use among certain geographic locations.

Any number beginning with 000 will NEVER be a valid SSN.

The information in our records about an individual is confidential by law and cannot be disclosed except in certain very restricted cases permitted by regulations.

** 700-728 Issuance of these numbers to railroad employees was discontinued July 1, 1963.

[Kleon]

Susan Daniels found an 1890 birth date listed with the 042 prefixed SSN.

I think you either misread the report or she is making stuff up. There has never been any other name directly tied to the number believed to be Obama's. What I've seen is some very weak circumstantial evidence I'm surprised they even posted.

[Goreknowshowtocheat]

Well, we all know about your wonderful legal system. It keeps illegals in office long after they should be serving time. I am sure you will applaud once “the one” is free to continue destroying the country. When citizens have no standing, the citizens have no country. That is where we are now.

[EDINVA]

“I am sure you will applaud once “the one” is free to continue destroying the country.”

What utter nonsense! I am sorry if you don’t like “my” legal system, the laws the way they are, or even receiving accurate information about what the court has ordered in this instance. But they are what they are. Maybe you can run for office to change them?

Give up a couple of years of YOUR life working pro bono for ‘the cause,’ then come back and tell me what I will or will not applaud. We can compare notes.

[freepersup]

Appreciate the post. Perhaps, I am an exception... I have a 454 prefix as I applied for a SS # at the US post office in downtown Phoenix, AZ., located on Central Ave. (main north & south corridor through Phx.) in 1972. I wanted to join the military. I devised a plan to apply for a SS # and project myself as a 17 year old, even though I was just 15. The thing was that at 17 I would still need my parents permission and they would not agree when I was just a mere 15 years old. In other words, a less than well thought out plan. In 2006, I went to the SS admin. and corrected this act of malfeasance.

[freepersup]

Before your last nerve goes ape shit... can you at least acknowledge that Orly Taitz is still fighting the good fight, even though a bunch of us here at FR are just bantering about, as keyboard commandos are wont to do? I know it's asking alot.

The afterbirther moniker is a start. ;0)

[freepersup]

Build your case by posting the facts (purty please.)

Glad to see that you are a rugby player type and willing to mix it up in a scrum.

Well done Kleon.

;0)

[freepersup]

I’m not the gate keeper so take it for what it’s worth- what are you doing to Obama that challenges his eligibility status as a natural born citizen? The hurdle is ENORMOUS, considering the desired outcome. Orly has breath in her body, therefore she is actively engaging the forces aligned against her, AND THEY ARE MANY.