Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2011 5:25:34 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: rabscuttle385

The Daniels supporter drones always seemed shocked and amazed that some conservatives don’t trust little Mitch. Gee, I wonder why?


2 posted on 05/18/2011 5:27:48 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (American Thinker Columnist / Rush ghost contributor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Sadly, only Daniels, Romney and Palin can have any hope of matching Obama’s fundraising juggernaut. No one else has a chance.


3 posted on 05/18/2011 5:28:46 AM PDT by montag813 (Stop Illegal Immigration: JOIN http://facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Daniels is an NWO Globalist Bush Clone.


4 posted on 05/18/2011 5:32:08 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (Shut up and eat your Beans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Just heard Zuckerman on FOX say that we (the GOP) won’t win the election unless we nominate a “centrist”, if we do, we stand a good chance of winning. I think Daniels would be another McCain and the dims are NOT afraid of Daniels, that means they want him to be it.


6 posted on 05/18/2011 5:34:27 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Sara, Michelle or DeMint could steal this election.


7 posted on 05/18/2011 5:35:27 AM PDT by kenmcg (pROBLEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Who are these so-called “GOP Elite”?
Are they the East Coast RINO-LIB blue bloods of the Manhattan, THE Hamptons and Martha’s Vineyard?
Are they the Washington DC Liberal Infected Insider cocktail party crowd?
Are they the West Coast Kalifornia Feel-Gooders Association?
Are they the Mid-West Go Along To Get Along Groupies?
Just who the hell are these traitors?................................


10 posted on 05/18/2011 5:37:33 AM PDT by Red Badger (Jesus said there is no marriage in Heaven. That's why they call it Heaven............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Can you imagine the stories in 2004 if Bush was running for re-election with $4 gas, 9% unemployment, $14 trillion in debt, tanked real estate....

I’m guessing they wouldn’t be saying he’s a shoo-in.


13 posted on 05/18/2011 5:40:12 AM PDT by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Did not vote off insane mccain and not going to vote for his clone.


14 posted on 05/18/2011 5:40:20 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Bigtime barf alert! It seems that RINO Mitch’s Indiana Supreme Court appointee has just ruled that LEA can invade homes at a whim without notification of the homeowner. As Paul Ryan said of Newt, with RINOs making SC appointments like that, who needs ‘rat appointments? Just think what RINO Mitch could do to the USSC.


16 posted on 05/18/2011 5:44:12 AM PDT by izzatzo (Palin2012, she's one of us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

I don’t get it! I didn’t even know who this “Elmer Fudd Wannabe” was until a couple of weeks ago and it seems like the conservative “elite” are shoving him down our throats like he’s the next coming of the Lord. Hannity even had Luntz poll the guy last night and he hasn’t even said anything yet. Did anyone see that (and manage to stay awake)? Fortunately, I was able to flip channels to the “tooth surgery” channel just before my eyelids completely shut. Infinitely more exciting than listening to Mitch Dani . . . Crap! Almost fell asleep again. If the Republicans are Hell bent on ensuring RINO domination for the next century (and of course losing) I recommend a “Dole/McCain” ticket. Sure, they’ll lose (again), but Boehner and the other RINO’s will never, ever have to worry about missing a tee time or drinks at the 19th hole. . . Republicans in the minority never have to worry about missing that kind of stuff.


18 posted on 05/18/2011 5:47:33 AM PDT by juan_galt (De oppresso liber - Quien es Juan Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

“Top Republicans”, “party establishment”, and Weeper of the House John Boehner.

These are not the sources I go to to determine who to support. In fact, if any of these are for someone, I would instinctively be opposed to their selection knowing what panty waists they all are.

I had already pretty much written Daniels off. But knowing that Boehner is for Daniels seals it for me.

There are no perfect candidates. But I will not support another Jorge Bush, Bob Dole, Juan McCain, Willard Romney, Tim Pawlenty, Rick Perry, Mitch Daniels, or similar ilk just because the establishment insiders favor them.

There are candidates already in the race that I can support: Bachmann and, possibly, Cain (though I want to learn more about specifics of his positions).

And if someone like DeMint or Palin were to announce, it could be a real “game changer”.


21 posted on 05/18/2011 5:53:03 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

He’s not going to run.

Not with his wishy washy, toe testing approach.

Rather don’t like his pro-Arab, RINO credentials anyway.


33 posted on 05/18/2011 6:10:53 AM PDT by G Larry (I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Pandering to Muslims is trait he has in common with Zero.

http://indianamuslims.org/index.php/events/governors-annual-iftar/98


36 posted on 05/18/2011 6:17:09 AM PDT by Stymee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Will he side with Israel? Is he Pro-Gay? There are social things I think he is hiding. I am a Hoosier and should know my governor, but I don’t. There are red flags about the guy. We don’t want just a “better” president, we want an excellent one. I am a bit tired of mediocrity and we don’t have to settle for it this time.


44 posted on 05/18/2011 6:31:25 AM PDT by Stymee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

At 5’7” he is not a towering leadership figure to be feared. His Harley makes him look bigger than he is, but standing next to Obama in a debate? He will look like a wimp! Appearance does count these day, the media will play it and exaggerate his small stature. He can’t win, the MSM will see to it.


47 posted on 05/18/2011 6:37:16 AM PDT by Stymee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

Herman Cain came out and boldly proclaimed that he would have no Muslims on his staff. Te antithesis of politically correct.


48 posted on 05/18/2011 6:41:22 AM PDT by Stymee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

CASTRATI ALERT!!!!!!!


53 posted on 05/18/2011 6:49:42 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (Oligarchy...My theory is, college student body presidents become DEMS orRINO's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385; All
What we need is a candidate who can do three things.

First, he or she has to convince a sufficient majority of the public that limited government, free market solutions are the only route for America's future.

Second, he or she has to make it clear to that same public that in order to get to that future, many of their favorite government goodies have to be reduced or eliminated.

Third, the public need to be told that there will be no more crony capitalism, no more bailouts. The resulting deleveraging will be painful, but it cannot be deferred without increasing the pain in the long run.

In short, we need a Churchill who will paint a vision of victory, but only after much toil, tears, and sweat.

What I'm afraid we will get is glib promises of a quick fix. When the quick fix does not come, conservatism's credibility will once again be heavily damaged.

I don't think Daniels is a Churchill. But I think that Palin, Cain, and Bachmann are all pretty much quick-fix types, telling the voters what they want to hear, rather than what they need to hear.

59 posted on 05/18/2011 7:24:40 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Populism is antithetical to conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385

the northwest Indiana times

Attorney will appeal ruling that Hoosiers have no right to resist illegal police entry

By Dan Carden dan.carden@nwi.com, (317) 637-9078 | Posted: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:00 pm

INDIANAPOLIS | An Evansville lawyer will ask the Indiana Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling that Hoosiers have no right to resist illegal police entry into their homes.

“We’re just not going to let this lie; we’re going to see if there’s anything we can do about it,” said Erin Berger, attorney for Richard Barnes.

Barnes was convicted of misdemeanor resisting law enforcement for shoving a police officer who tried to enter Barnes’ home after Barnes told the officer he couldn’t come in.

The Indiana Court of Appeals overturned Barnes’ conviction because the jury was not instructed on Barnes’ common law right to resist illegal police entry into his home.

But in a 3-2 decision written by Justice Steven David, an appointee of Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, the state’s high court reinstated the conviction and proclaimed “the right to reasonably resist an unlawful police entry into a home is no longer recognized under Indiana law.”

Berger said she was “surprised” at how far the court went in its decision.

“It paints with a very broad brush, and I hope that the Supreme Court will consider revisiting how broad the ruling appears to be on its face,” Berger said.

Berger told The Times she will file a petition for rehearing in the next few weeks asking the Indiana Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling.

If the state’s high court denies her petition or affirms the original ruling, Berger said she plans to appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

Since the court’s decision last Thursday, Berger said she’s been contacted by attorneys, law professors and many others offering assistance for an appeal.

http://www.nwitimes.com/news/state-and-regional/indiana/article_6fcc91e5-e96c-5199-b554-0e4c5a8b3665.html?print=1


66 posted on 05/18/2011 10:36:30 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
I, Sarabaracuda, do hereby swear to support the Republican nominee for president no matter who she or he may be.

I urge all Freepers to take this pledge along with me.
68 posted on 05/18/2011 3:04:56 PM PDT by Sarabaracuda (Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson