Photos can be checked for photoshopping just as “birth certificates” can.
We’ve already had one photoshopped photo of a dead Osama. Unfortunately, the digital capabilities we have now make analysis a necessity.
When the POTUS presents to everybody an image of a 1961 official document that has kerning and has been scanned in a format that allows manipulation.... it reduces the credibility of both him and everybody who went along with his charade. That’s just a natural fact of life.
Have you compared the most recent BC with one someone else has recently gotten from Hawaii? How does Hawaii produce the BC now when requested? Is it just a photocopy onto a blank form or is it printed out from a computer copy?
“We’ve already had one photoshopped photo of a dead Osama.”
True. And did you see the link in post 250?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54162.html
So. In less than 48 hours we see conflicts and contradictions to the official White House “story.”
And people ricidule us because we don’t swallow the White House/MSM versions du jour?
(Changing tagline)