N&V: “How do you interpret the spelling of THE as TXE in the alleged rubber stamp?”
Well, it isn’t really a very good “X” either from what I have seen.
What would be the advantage of forging an “X” instead of an “H”? Doesn’t really seem to be any good reason that I can think. The stuff you would want to forge are signatures, dates, etc. So it is possible this was just a smudge of the rubber stamp or a foreign object that got onto the stamp.
The bigger questions in my mind are the Registrar and the Dr. that signed these. I think those are the best leads to follow to determine if they are legitimate and could honestly have been able to sign this document. Most all the other data on this document has been presented on other documentation.
There is also the mystery that another poster (forget who) on FR mentioned regarding the signature dates of SAD and the doctor. Seems those are the exact same dates that were on the “forged” Kenyan B.C. that was floating around the web. Very, very coincidental that those dates would be identical since there was supposedly no exposure of this document prior to this week.
So, what was it about that document that left us thinking of it as a forgery?
My thought was "My word that was a third-world hellhole ~ only the rich and powerful were born in hospitals there, and birth registrations were not uniformly done"
That kind of took the wind out of that particular document. But now that we find it had the right dates and times on it, I guess that proves it really was a forgery put out there to mess with our heads.
Remember, when you're caught in a lie the courts don't have to believe you on anything.
That one, at that time, in the local language, was fairly gutteral ~ so, knowing that, someone substituting an existing H with an X for no good reason is probably AN ENGLISH MAJOR playing with your head.
The Lucas Smith Kenya "birth certificate" is a clear fraud. Mombasa was not a part of Kenya in 1961. It was part of Zanzibar, and only became a part of newly-independent Kenya in 1963.
In any event, a close examination strongly suggests that the dates on the Lucas Smith fraud are not 8/8/1961 for the attending doctor (which should've come first) and 8/7/1961, but 8/5/1961 and 8/7/1961. Note that the second digit in the attending doctor date is different from the first one, which is constructed with two circles. What digit can it possibly be? It's a 5.
People don't seem to give the certificates that claim Obama was born in Kenya the same level of scrutiny they're giving to the one released by the White House.