In the absence of a legitimate U. K. C. Lee turning up, I interpret it as evidence of a sloppy fraud.
How do you interpret the spelling of THE as TXE in the alleged rubber stamp?
N&V: “How do you interpret the spelling of THE as TXE in the alleged rubber stamp?”
Well, it isn’t really a very good “X” either from what I have seen.
What would be the advantage of forging an “X” instead of an “H”? Doesn’t really seem to be any good reason that I can think. The stuff you would want to forge are signatures, dates, etc. So it is possible this was just a smudge of the rubber stamp or a foreign object that got onto the stamp.
The bigger questions in my mind are the Registrar and the Dr. that signed these. I think those are the best leads to follow to determine if they are legitimate and could honestly have been able to sign this document. Most all the other data on this document has been presented on other documentation.
There is also the mystery that another poster (forget who) on FR mentioned regarding the signature dates of SAD and the doctor. Seems those are the exact same dates that were on the “forged” Kenyan B.C. that was floating around the web. Very, very coincidental that those dates would be identical since there was supposedly no exposure of this document prior to this week.