Good point, I believe that OCR data would not be pixilated, it would convert into some type of font, is that not correct? Where is Trump on this issue? Very suspicious that after all the hoopla he has done on the birth certificate that he would accept this document without question.
“Good point, I believe that OCR data would not be pixilated, it would convert into some type of font, is that not correct?”
Yes, indeedy, that is the whole point of optical character recognition: to convert an image into a text file.
Correct, "if" the quality of the pixelated image is good enough for OCR software to read it. If not, then garbage. I saw no evidence of text data in the .pdf. (except for the information concerning the Mac and internal Mac software)
endobj 27 0 obj /Author () /Producer (Mac OS X 10.6.7 Quartz PDFContext) /Creator (Preview) /Keywords () /ModDate (D:20110427120924Z00'00') /Title () /Subject () /CreationDate (D:20110427120924Z00'00') /AAPL:Keywords [()] endobj
In my opinion trying technical analysis on the scanning of what the HI Dept. of Health sent in print form is a fruitless effort. I they had sent a data file in .pdf format, it might have been another issue.
I won’t believe Trump is off/away from the birth issue until he says it is no longer important. As I recall Trump qualified his first comment on Obama’s presentation with ‘if valid’. I’m no dihard Trump supporter but I do think he is picking his battles,e.g. the likes of comments made in Las Vegas.
I won’t believe Trump is off/away from the birth issue until he says it is no longer important. As I recall Trump qualified his first comment on Obama’s presentation with ‘if valid’. I’m no dihard Trump supporter but I do think he is picking his battles,e.g. the likes of comments made in Las Vegas.