Get the .pdf, folks, and enlarge it to 400%. You will never believe this is a real document after you do that.
Anomalies include:
1) A typewriter that has different capital “M” for the words “OBAMA” and “P.M.”
2) Green letters and black letters right next to one another; usually dates.
3) Within a given word, say “STANLEY”, the “S” is pixelated completely differently than “TANLEY”
4) The “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” in the bottom right has a clearly lame cut-and-paste of “AUG 8, 196” and the numeral “1” is from a totally different font, source, color, etc.
5) Check the heavy pixelation of the “Signature of the Attendant”. It is very boxy, and irresolved. Check the relatively smooth non-pixelation of the “Date of Signature” handwriting to the right. I know of no way these different levels of resolution could have come from the same scan.
It just looks like a bad cut-and-paste job to me.
Thanks! Looks like the jig is up.
The "M" looks to me to be printed on the form itself, just like all the title headings. Given that there is always an M. (AM or PM), they just had it pre-printed on the form. It looks the same on the Nordyke BC.
1) The M is pre-filled on the form. The attendant just has to add A or P.
2) ??
3) That’s the scanning software used to put the document into a PDF.
4) I suspect that the stamp used read Aug 8 196 and then the attended writes in the 1.
5) As in 3 above, you can’t look at pixelation from a scanned into PDF copy. You would need to look at a high-definition picture of the document in order to do pixel analysis - and even then pixelation only matters on digitally altered documents. It doesn’t matter on printed documents that are then scanned.
1) The M is pre-filled on the form. The attendant just has to add A or P.
2) ??
3) That’s the scanning software used to put the document into a PDF.
4) I suspect that the stamp used read Aug 8 196 and then the attendant writes in the 1.
5) As in 3 above, you can’t look at pixelation from a scanned into PDF copy. You would need to look at a high-definition picture of the document in order to do pixel analysis - and even then pixelation only matters on digitally altered documents. It doesn’t matter on printed documents that are then scanned.
It just looks like a bad cut-and-paste job to me.
_____________________________________________________
It IS a bad cut-and-paste job. Just like the original COLB Obama released on Kos. So why? Why is Obama PROLONGING and INCREASING this BC controversy? Also notice the date of this amateurish hack job is April 25, 2011.
And the after-birther Obama-bots on this thread are claiming this ENDS the Certifigate crisis?
Hoo boy!
for what it is worth, the M issue is because the M in pm is already on the form, the hospital only has to type in A or P.