Posted on 04/23/2011 4:26:06 PM PDT by TommyDale
Snopes' Certification of Live Birth shows supposedly issued in August, 1961 but the Revision date is 11/01. What is REALLY interesting is the light blue time stamp that reveals the actual date of issuance as Jun 6 2007. See the picture for the highlighted area showing the time stamp from the back side where it bleeds through. Hold it up to a mirror and you can see the date!
(Excerpt) Read more at msgboard.snopes.com ...
BHO, Sr was not a typical American black. Nor was Hawaii a typical American state with respect to race relations in 1961. BHO, Sr was in fact a minor local celebrity because of his novelty. His graduation from UH merited its own article in the Honolulu Advertiser:
I have no trouble believing he could have been listed as African on the original long form.
I see that in the Nordyke long form BC. However, it’s a greater leap from “Negro” to being classified as “African” as a race back in 1961. They could have stuck with a more general classification using the old terms of Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid, and Australoid.
Anyone have *%&^ of steel to try this and just ask?
http://www.chamberofcommerce.com/honolulu-hi/1911849-onaka-alvin-t-phd/
"African" is not a RACE. anyone born in Africa is 'African' and that includes hundreds of thousands of whites and other RACES.
This was just the same kind of dumb forgers mistake that jumps out of the page with anyone who's paying attention, the same as in the case of Rather's 'th' flub
"African" would not have been used in any time or place. Numerous races live in Africa in the millions. White, Hispanic (if you call that a race), Asian, negroid, Semitic and others.
BO wasn’t born he was shxt out and his birth certificate is a few sheets of one ply.
I have spoken to him. I am CERTAIN he would not answer anything relating to Obama’s COLB or the records which generated it.
There's no point in such a forgery, since the State of Hawaii has the true facts on file. The sort of forgery you are describing only works if there is no way to cross check the facts.
I’ve not taken a position on that one, so I won’t argue the point. Does it seem odd? Yes, but everything surrounding Obama’s life and his documentation is odd.
There is your answer. I cannot believe that Obama was the only black person born in Hawaii in 1961.
American blacks don't count. Go dig up birth certificates for children born to foreign black students in Hawaii in 1961 and see how their parents' races were listed. I suspect, even you find all of then, the sample will be much too small to allow statistical generalization.
Lying is OK with them if it fulfills their Marxist goals.
That is exactly what I have been saying all along -- although not as eloquently as you said it.
******
This is mirse. Thank you for your kind compliment.
Like many posters here, I don't know if anyone reads my messages, so I appreciate it that you took the time to read and respond to my message. Thanks again.
That's the Hawaii privacy law. However, Chiyome Fukino recently claimed to have examined the actual long form twice and that everything is on the up and up, that the facts match what the CoLB says, and that the doubts are silly
.
So, to attack the CoLB, one must establish that Hawaii is lying and covering for Obama and has been since 2007, when a Republican was governor.
What does a hot Afrikanerette prove?
It proves as mush as your article proclaiming Obama Sr. is an African
That makes sense, especially since I'm a photographer. It should have clicked. Thanks!
It's much simpler.
READ SLOOOWWWLY.
“African” is NOT A RACE, period, just like ‘American” is not a RACE.
By the forger using “African” for race, it provides one of the delicious little faux pas moments that trips them up.
I've been posting about this one glaring error for 2 years.
Hundreds of thousands of people have been, are being born in Africa - without a drop of ‘Negro’ or “black” blood.
Once again. “AFRICAN” is not a RACE!
The forger is an ignoramus.
It’s not a race and it’s not a country.
But they do use the continent as race for Asians.
Weird.
There is not evidence that he ever ordered the COLB shown on the net. The HDOH has been asked about that and they have refused to say that they ever issued one. There is no legal reason not to if they did.
I also wonder why the certificate number is blacked out? It would reveal nothing personal. It would not be subject to identity theft or any misuse that I can think of. Other than verifying the legitimacy of the document itself by checking back with HDOH records I don't know of any other use for the certificate number.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.