No, the bill asked for a birth certificate.
I read the bill. It was vague and ambigous.
I’m thinking the COLB would have sufficed.
But. That’s not why she vetoed it. She vetoed it based on the power to the Sec. of State.
Or - maybe that’s what she wants to have the dumocrats believe.
I've read the language in the bill, and it didn't require a candidate to prove that they are a Natural Born Citizen, per the Framers' understanding of the term.
What's the point of providing a birth certificate, if all it does is prove who you are? Obama's COLB would serve, under the strict language contained in that Arizona bill.
Given these facts, I can't say that I'm upset with Brewer for vetoing it. As written, the bill didn't accomplish what we want it to.