Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton
say state officials are not fully qualified to determine the validity of a candidate's documents.

Who in Hell's Bells IS qualified to determine eligibility?

Right now, eligibility, apparently, is determined in secret, by political hacks, using an unknown, unstated standard of eligibility, with no ability to challenge or remedy their determination.

5 posted on 04/13/2011 1:47:10 PM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG

The Little League Baseball coach is qualified. And maybe the folks at the DMV.


23 posted on 04/13/2011 2:53:28 PM PDT by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

There is a Constitutional birth standard. It’s really quite simple. I’m paraphrasing, but the core of it is this: To be eligible to run for president one must be a native born American (i.e. born of an American father on American soil).

In the days before the deceiving and lying Marxists came along political parties wanting to run a presidential candidate had to sign a document attesting to the person’s eligibility. Also, in the days before the Marxists took over the media, objective reporters did their own fact finding and basically verified a persobn’s presidential eligibiity.

The Marxist demrat party does not subscribe to the US Constitution so Pelosi, as the leader of the Demrat Party at the time, had absolutely no qualms about lying about Onada’s eligibility in that document. And the media, the Demrat Party propaganda organs, simply followed the party line.

If this Constitutional requirement did not exist, do you think The Usurping Marxist Onada would be spending millions of dollars in legal fees to squelch demands to see a credible birth document?


43 posted on 04/13/2011 5:39:38 PM PDT by dools0007world
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Exactly. That situation is not acceptable. It is rule by men, not by laws. It’s opposite everything this nation is supposed to be about.

That’s why we really need to make sure that every state passes a law or ballot initiative specifically granting legal standing to any registered voter to challenge in court the eligibility of any candidate on their ballot. The determination of eligibility should be made transparently by the people who are Constitutionally authorized to interpret what “natural born citizen” actually means.


46 posted on 04/13/2011 6:41:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson