Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can the Voting Machines Used in American Elections Be Trusted?

Posted on 04/05/2011 11:59:30 AM PDT by pinochet

I recently heard someone mention that it is possible for computer hackers to get access to the electronic voting machines, and tamper with the results.

The only voting process that I trust, is one that involves a paper ballot, with the voter making a "X" mark on his paper ballot with a pen/pencil. That is how American democracy worked for 200 years.

With paper ballots, you can count actual paper votes, during recounts. But under the electronic voting system, you cannot have credible recounts, because it is so easy to hack into the computer system.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: diebold; elections; electoralfraud; votefraud; voterfraud; votingmachines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
The enemies of America may decide to fix the 2012 elections, to keep Obambi in power. I do not even trust the results of the 2008 elections.
1 posted on 04/05/2011 11:59:40 AM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pinochet

no


2 posted on 04/05/2011 12:02:47 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

You may be interested in this story of computer hacking in India: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1730208/indian-voting-machine-hacker-released


3 posted on 04/05/2011 12:03:22 PM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/05/family-mentally-handicapped-man-says-victim-voter-fraud/


4 posted on 04/05/2011 12:03:35 PM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Often the machines are loaded with votes before the polls open.

Add the dead and you have electorate victories by fraud.


5 posted on 04/05/2011 12:03:49 PM PDT by Carley (UNION AGITATORS, NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

no


6 posted on 04/05/2011 12:04:20 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

The concern isn’t about the machines, but those who operate them!!!


7 posted on 04/05/2011 12:04:38 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier preparing to deploy to Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

I have been a computer programmer for over 26 years. I don’t know of any computer programmer, liberal or conservative, who thinks electronic voting is a good idea. We all know how easy it would be to skew the elections, either on purpose or by accident.

Sometimes paper is the right technology, and this is one of those times. What difference does it make if we don’t know the results of an election for a week or two? One of the lessons we should have taken away from the 2000 election is that we can go on quite well without knowing the outcome for several weeks. Another lesson is that electronic voting just exacerbates the problem of voter fraud. It does nothing to stop or minimize it.


8 posted on 04/05/2011 12:04:38 PM PDT by StonyMan451
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

They don’t have to hack the machines. Just station thugs outside the polling places to intimidate people. That is not a civil rights issue as long as they are ‘Holder’s people’.


9 posted on 04/05/2011 12:04:48 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

More bad news on those goddamn machines: http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/06/diebold-voting-machine-hacked-in-four-minutes-flat/


10 posted on 04/05/2011 12:04:59 PM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

The machines are not on a network. They are stand alone machines like an ATM.


11 posted on 04/05/2011 12:06:10 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
Fixed title:

Can the Voting Machines Used in American Elections Be Trusted?

Answer still NO.

12 posted on 04/05/2011 12:08:31 PM PDT by The Cajun (Palin, Bachmann, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Rush, Hannity......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
I wouldn't trust it.

If I had been asked to program such machines, I might have put in a back door method to transfer five percent of the stupid votes to make those voters appear more sophisticated.

ML/NJ

13 posted on 04/05/2011 12:09:59 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad
The concern isn’t about the machines, but those who operate them!!!

When they count the votes for the Oscars, they use an accounting firm to validate the results, why couldn't we do the same with the ballots for elections.

14 posted on 04/05/2011 12:10:16 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

The software in each machine can be manipulated prior to the voting. As was said earlier, any software guy or gal worth their salt can fix them any way they want. Go to paper ballets.


15 posted on 04/05/2011 12:11:12 PM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
When Bush won, the left was all up in arms about a grand conspiracy involving voting machines.

Now that 0bama won, it is the right concerned about voting machines?

Come on!

If it was even likely that 0bama would lose to McCain then there might have been a need to cheat. 0bama had about 53% of the voting public bamboozled before the election, and he got about 53% of the votes. Mystery of how he won the election solved. Occam's razor engaged.

16 posted on 04/05/2011 12:11:34 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Paper ballots, ID and ink stained fingers. That will be the only way we get fair elections.


17 posted on 04/05/2011 12:11:55 PM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AbeLincoln
I don't like the purely electronic version. What would be better is a electronic voter for rapid return, but also creates a paper trail for auditing. This way, you could see if the electronic vote matches the paper vote.

Also, there should be an enforced chain of custody for these machines. Have the company certify that the machines were without error and zeroed when they left the factory, and each person who is in possession of the machine would have to sign the chain of custody until the audit has been completed.

Then, have draconian penalties for precincts that have errors greater than a reasonable cut-off level (say 0.0 to 0.1% of the total votes) for those who signed off on the chain of custody.

18 posted on 04/05/2011 12:13:15 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AbeLincoln

Exactly! The way the media “calls” the elections before all the polls are closed I think skews the results as well.


19 posted on 04/05/2011 12:14:05 PM PDT by Grumpybutt (Gender Traditionalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

You need only hack the cumulative results, not individual machines.
The NSA system has (presumably) greater security, yet it has been hacked....so how can anyone claim election results are believable.
Paper has problems, but auditing the results is much more convincing then the electronic replacement.


20 posted on 04/05/2011 12:14:55 PM PDT by blues-train (blues train)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson