Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Won't Back Off Obama's Birth Papers
Newsmax.com ^ | Thursday, 24 Mar 2011 06:36 PM | By Jim Meyers and Ashley Martella

Posted on 03/25/2011 11:17:06 PM PDT by Mr. K

Donald Trump is not backing down from his demand that President Barack Obama produce his birth certificate and stepped up his criticism by questioning why he has not released other personal records, including college transcripts and legislative papers. The billionaire real estate tycoon and star of “The Apprentice” created a stir on Wednesday when he said on “The View” that Obama must release his birth certificate. Now Trump has reiterated his call in an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV, with this simple message for Obama: Why don’t you produce your birth certificate and put to rest all speculation that you were born outside the United States? He says Obama’s birth certificate controversy is a “strange situation” — there are conflicting reports as to what Honolulu hospital he was born at, and the governor of Hawaii claims he somehow remembers Obama being born 50 years ago.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birth; birthcertificate; birthertrump; certificate; certifigate; hawaii; naturalborncitizen; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: PA-RIVER
A year ago, my father, in his 70’s, joked about birthers being stupid. Now, he tells me he cant wait to see a state force Obama to show his BC.

Last night, Hannity had 5 minutes dedicated to the issue, demanding to see the BC.

So, The cat is out of the bag. People know he's a fraud. This issue is getting bigger by the minute.

When Governor Abercrombie, a true-blue Obamaite, failed to come up with any documentation after loudly proclaiming that it would be his first act in office, all serious people realized that there is no such documentation.

Instead, it is now clear to everyone that we have a Kenyan usurper occupying the White House, having pulled off the most astonishing fraud since the days of Rome.

101 posted on 03/26/2011 6:45:46 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Mr, K,
“the GOP is willing to- bunch of pussies”.
You are far too kind towards the GOP leaders.


102 posted on 03/26/2011 6:53:32 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Obammy, the man is too small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Photobucket
103 posted on 03/26/2011 6:59:14 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arbooz

I was going to change my tag line but I might as well keep it permanently. It’s disturbing.


104 posted on 03/26/2011 6:59:23 AM PDT by Stentor ( "All cults of personality begin as high drama and end as low comedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jongaltsr
It takes someone with Trumps money and connections to dig in Hawaii and Kenya and find the truth of the matter

My guess is that like a good lawyer, he already knows the answer to the question he is asking. The Donald has Barry's number.

105 posted on 03/26/2011 7:17:42 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannolis. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

you have a way with words!


106 posted on 03/26/2011 7:25:50 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I agree, he is an anus, and not a conservative by any stretch of the imagination.


107 posted on 03/26/2011 7:26:39 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bubman

Trump is a marketing genius.
He knows how to keep himself in the headlines for the next year and a half.


108 posted on 03/26/2011 7:29:26 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Apple Pan Dowdy

Agree, good idea.


109 posted on 03/26/2011 7:30:08 AM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Asking Americans to simply accept obama’s story ‘as is’ is too much to ask. “W.T.F.?” over.


110 posted on 03/26/2011 7:51:20 AM PDT by GBA (Those who die with the most liberty...Win! Ever Vigilance: For the children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

When Obama is found to be ineligible, because he Lied about himself & his

past ******* This is “Treason” !!!********

Then everything he instituted will be disallowed!!

Obama’s VP, his Cabinet, his Czars, & all laws (ObamaCare) & all

appointments including

(Supreme Court) are “invalid”!!

Presidency will have to go to John Boehner

Speaker of the House ... That’s why Pelosi wanted to hold onto her

speakership ... so; she thought when she “rated” on Obama, she would be

President “Not” Biden because he was complicit with Obama’s cover-up...

Well

Pelosi was the “enabler” who got Obama installed as as Democratic Nominee by

“Lying” about his Constitutional eligibility!!

Biden was complicit with Obama’s Treason & Fraud!!!

**************************
Keep pushing Donald Trump!! Expose these Treasonous Lies of Obama!!

***********************************


111 posted on 03/26/2011 8:40:18 AM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: arbooz
I do think FR has gone a bit wobbly lately...Perhaps you are right about the regulars' dropping out - sometimes feel likewise myself.

It just seems to be a lot less lively conservatively than it has been over the past couple years. I'm not sure what accounts for it.

112 posted on 03/26/2011 8:57:43 AM PDT by paulycy (Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: RBIEL2
most likely his true name is Barry Sotero, and Obama has never been official.

That's a pretty good guess, methinks.
113 posted on 03/26/2011 9:33:55 AM PDT by andyk (Wealth != Income)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GBA

I just finished reading Jack Cashill’s book “Deconstructing Obama”. He says “as the myth of Obama collapses, and it will, the media will sit and wonder what brought it down’. Trump is a good start.


114 posted on 03/26/2011 9:42:09 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

he’s the only one in America who can push this issue! imo of course


115 posted on 03/26/2011 9:47:29 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ebysan

Pelosi was the “enabler” who got Obama installed as as Democratic Nominee by

“Lying” about his Constitutional eligibility!!

_________________________________________________________________________________

Very true. Without her signature and the candidate declaration from the national level DNC, Obama/Biden do not go on the ballot in Hawaii. This is because the ‘locals’ refused to sign-off. Specifically, Brian Schatz submitted an invalid document that specifically did not declare the ticket Constitutionally eligible.

Details of the Hawaii events here:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html


116 posted on 03/26/2011 9:49:34 AM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman
“....Of course, a ‘temporary’ halt to the election process will have to be observed along with shutting down of the internet and certain radio talk stations and cable news programs to prevent further incitement to riot.
....”

A President could proclaim this all he wants, but remember we don't have one national federally administered election! We have 50 state-contolled elections. Maybe a few Rat Govs & Rat controlled legislatures will go along with it, but I doubt it.

117 posted on 03/26/2011 9:55:08 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
So, you supported a liberal for president once. Most people have.

I think Richard Nixon was quite Conservative in 1960 when I supported him against Kennedy. He certainly was active in the fight against commies infiltrating the government. When he finally won in 1968, RMN was a real disappointment with the EPA, wage and price controls and such.

I don't know if he was a closet liberal all of his life or if he evolved (devolved is more apt) to that position once he gained office.

So, how are Tom and Daisy doing? :-)

118 posted on 03/26/2011 10:04:02 AM PDT by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

Thank You, bluecat6!!

The more the truth is printed.............. The bigger the Case we have against the

Treasonus Obama’s Removal!!

Very good link.. Thanks for posting

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2011/01/o-con-had-legal-help-from-non-partisan.html

****************Read Jack Cashill’s “Deconstructing Obama”.... Truthful, Factual & Informative!!

Jack Cashill is not just a journalist he is an Investigative Journalist...... A lot of

research went into this book...... I hated to put it down...... If enough people

read this book & comment on it, then the MSM will be forced to expose this

“Fraud” in Our WH!!


119 posted on 03/26/2011 10:14:58 AM PDT by ebysan (ebysan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

I don’t understand.

It seems to me that it’s a simple question of whether that House resolution is constitutional or unconstitutional. That’s a Supreme Court question. Is it constitutional for a house resolution to state where a person was born and, if so, does that suffice for evidence for saying whether a person is eligible to be President (i.e., make a person a “natural born citizen”)?

That’s a constitutional question, one that should be discussed before the Supreme Court. I suspect they would find it unconstitutional.


120 posted on 03/26/2011 10:18:09 AM PDT by walterandrews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson