Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tommyjo
I realize they can carry standoff missiles, but a B-52 can carry airlaunched cruise missiles...conventional bomb payloads? B-52.....hell, Obama pissed away over a 100 cruise missiles, what's the matter, they didn't work? So you'd risk a $300 Billion dollar aircraft to save a B-52 or an F-15/16 etc., one tenth the cost?

It, like the other cross-world sorties at the outbreaks, is just a justification for its existence.

155 posted on 03/23/2011 1:26:40 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer
Off on the cost. It's only $2.1 billion.
156 posted on 03/23/2011 1:50:19 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

It has nothing to do with the cost and it never should be. You send in your best asset to do that kind of work. Yes a B-52H can also do the mission, but it has a radar cross section the size of a barn door and consequently it is at risk. Libyan air defences might be old, but anyone can get a lucky shot off. Why give the enemy any chance to down and capture Aircrew?

This is no different to any other conflict that the US has been involved in. The B-2 was even used in Afghanistan in 2001 to take out the air assets and old Soviet era SAM and radar networks still in Taliban hands. It is designed to be used and not sidelined simply to save money. Let the professionals get on with their job rather than worrying about cost.


161 posted on 03/24/2011 11:09:42 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson